Capital.com vs Fusion Markets Forex Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of Capital.com and Fusion Markets across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Score 4.3 / 5
2 bonusesVery low minimum deposit, AI-powered trading insights, zero commission, and strong FCA/ASIC/CySEC regulation - accessible for new traders.
VS
Score 4.2 / 5
2 bonusesOne of the lowest-cost ECN brokers globally at $4.50/lot, no minimum deposit, and three platform options - strong value for cost-conscious traders.
Our Verdict
Too close to call0.1 pts apart
Capital.com and Fusion Markets are extremely closely matched with scores of 4.3/5 and 4.2/5. The right choice depends on your individual trading priorities.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
Fusion Markets offers tighter spreads from 0 pips vs 0.6 pips for Capital.com, reducing trading costs.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
Capital.com has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.
Best for active traders
Recommended
Fusion Markets has a cost edge: raw/ECN spreads, tighter spreads from 0 pips.
Best for platform choice
It's a tie
Both equally suited
Both brokers offer an equivalent platform selection with similar exclusive and proprietary options.
Best for beginners
Recommended
Capital.com edges out Fusion Markets with a higher editorial score (4.3/5 vs 4.2/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.
Capital.com vs Fusion Markets: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 4.3/ 5 | 4.2/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.3 / 5▲ | 4.2 / 5 |
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.2 / 5 | 4.5 / 5▲ |
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 4.5 / 5▲ | 3.9 / 5 |
Customer Support 10% weight | 4.2 / 5▲ | 3.8 / 5 |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Melbourne, Australia |
| Min deposit | $20 | No minimum |
| Spreads from | 0.6 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission / lot | N/A | $4.5/lot |
| Max leverage | 30:1 | 500:1 |
| Withdrawal fee | Free | Free |
| Regulators | FCA ASIC MAS CySEC CMA | ASIC VFSC |
| Platforms | Proprietary Web/Mobile | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader |
| Active bonuses | ||
| Visit broker | Visit Capital.com | Visit Fusion Markets |
Capital.com vs Fusion Markets Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
Very low $20 minimum deposit
AI-powered pattern recognition built into proprietary platform
Zero commission on all trades
FCA, ASIC, CySEC, and MAS regulation
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
Investor compensation scheme coverage
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Multilingual customer support
Pros
Among the lowest ECN commissions globally at $4.50/lot round-turn
No minimum deposit and no inactivity fee
Supports MT4, MT5, and cTrader
ASIC regulated with strong Australian broker infrastructure
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
Raw spread account available
No deposit fees
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
Cons
Proprietary platform only - no MT4 or MT5
Limited product range for advanced traders
No phone support
No raw spread account option
No MetaTrader support
Cons
Smaller, newer broker (est. 2017) with limited global brand recognition
Limited research and educational content
VFSC license used for non-AU clients offers fewer protections
No investor compensation scheme
No proprietary platform
Limited charting capabilities
No 24/5 live chat
No phone support
Support available in limited languages
Capital.com vs Fusion Markets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
5
Capital.com
criteria wins
2
Fusion Markets
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | Capital.com | Fusion Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Pass | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Fail | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Fail | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Pass | Fail |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Fail |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Fail | Fail |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Fail |
Capital.com vs Fusion Markets: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, Capital.com ranks higher with a score of 4.3/5 vs 4.2/5 for Fusion Markets. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; Capital.com and Fusion Markets may each suit different trader profiles.
Fusion Markets offers tighter spreads starting from 0 pips, compared to Capital.com's spreads from 0.6 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, particularly valuable for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
Fusion Markets has a lower minimum deposit of no minimum required, while Capital.com requires at least $20. This makes Fusion Markets more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Both Capital.com and Fusion Markets hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Both are considered safe. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners: Fusion Markets has a lower minimum deposit (no minimum), lowering the barrier to entry; both brokers offer negative balance protection. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.
Capital.com offers maximum leverage of 30:1, while Fusion Markets offers up to 500:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.
Fusion Markets charges $4.5 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for the other broker are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.
Capital.com supports Proprietary Web/Mobile and Fusion Markets offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader; Capital.com exclusively offers Proprietary Web/Mobile; Fusion Markets exclusively offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader.
Ready to get started?
Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.
Score 4.2 / 5
More Broker Comparisons
More Capital.com comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker