AMarketsvs
Trading 212Stock Broker Comparison
This matchup compares AMarkets and Trading 212 on stock access, costs, and regulation. The tensions center on commission structure and safety nets for investors.
Our Verdict
Trading 212 winsClear Winner
Trading 212 has the higher editorial score over AMarkets. It also offers stronger regulation and protections.
Trading 212
4.2/5
AMarkets
3.2/5
Key Differences
- 1Trading 212 offers commission-free stock trading.
- 2AMarkets operates under offshore SVG/FSA with limited investor protection.
- 3Trading 212 provides fractional shares.
Who should choose AMarkets vs Trading 212?
Find out which stock broker best suits your investing profile.
Choose AMarkets if…
Choose AMarkets if you want ECN pricing on stock CFDs and high leverage.
Choose Trading 212 if…
Choose AMarkets if you prefer MT4/MT5 with copy trading and a broad product range. Choose Trading 212 if you want commission-free real stock trading and fractional shares. Choose Trading 212 if you value FCA/CySEC regulation and FSCS protection.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
Trading 212 wins for low-cost trading with commission-free stock trading.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
AMarkets vs Trading 212: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.2/ 5 | 4.2/ 5 |
| Min deposit | $100 | $1▼ lower |
| Spreads from | 0 pips | N/A |
| Commission / lot | $6/lot | N/A |
AMarkets vs Trading 212 Stock Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
- Stocks CFDs with ECN pricing and competitive spreads
- MT4/MT5 with copy trading integration
- Broad product range including equity CFDs alongside forex
Cons
- Offshore regulation (SVG/FSA), minimal investor protection
- No real share ownership, CFDs only
AMarkets vs Trading 212: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
4
AMarkets
criteria wins
6
Trading 212
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Fail | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Pass |
| No deposit fee | — | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Pass |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Pass |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Fail |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Fail |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Fail |
AMarkets vs Trading 212: Frequently Asked Questions
Trading 212 is the stronger choice: it rates 4.2/5 versus 3.2/5 for AMarkets, a gap that reflects clear differences across regulation, fees, and platform quality in our review.
AMarkets starts from 0. Current spread data is not available for Trading 212. Check both brokers' websites for up-to-date spread and commission pricing.
Trading 212 has $1, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes Trading 212 more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Trading 212 holds top-tier regulation (FCA, CySEC), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
Trading 212 stands out for beginners: it has a lower entry point and provides negative balance protection, which caps losses at your deposited amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
AMarkets lists maximum leverage of 3000:1, while Trading 212 lists up to 1:5. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
AMarkets charges $6 per trade on commission-based accounts. Commission details for Trading 212 are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing. Stock commissions may be charged as a flat rate per trade or per share; confirm the exact structure on each broker's website.
AMarkets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Trading 212 supports Trading 212 App. AMarkets has exclusive access to cTrader and MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. Trading 212 has exclusive access to Trading 212 App.
Trading 212 offers commission-free stock trading while AMarkets does not according to our data. Commission-free trading can reduce costs for frequent traders. Always confirm the current fee structure directly on each broker's website.
Trading 212 scores higher on investor protection criteria, with compensation scheme coverage and segregated client funds. For stock investors, confirming compensation scheme coverage ensures your assets are protected up to a defined limit if the broker becomes insolvent.
