FxProvs
Trading 212Stock Broker Comparison
This comparison pits FxPro and Trading 212 on regulation, costs, and investing features. The axis centers on commission structure, fractional investing, and platform breadth.
Our Verdict
Trading 212 winsby 0.4 pts
Trading 212 earns the higher editorial score, edging FxPro by 0.4 points.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1FxPro provides four platforms including MT4/MT5/cTrader; Trading 212 offers a single app.
- 2Trading 212 offers commission-free trades; FxPro relies on spreads.
- 3Trading 212 supports fractional shares and an ISA; FxPro does not.
Who should choose FxPro vs Trading 212?
Find out which stock broker best suits your investing profile.
Choose FxPro if…
Choose FxPro if you want four platforms including MT4, MT5 and cTrader. You also get 24/5 live chat and phone support.
Choose Trading 212 if…
Choose Trading 212 if you want commission-free stock trading, fractional shares, and a Stocks and Shares ISA. You also access automated portfolio pies for passive investing.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
Trading 212 wins for low-cost trading due to commission-free stock trading.
Best for safety & regulation
FxPro vs Trading 212: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.8/ 5 | 4.2/ 5 |
| Min deposit | $100 | $1▼ lower |
| Spreads from | 1.2 pips | N/A |
| Commission / lot | $7/lot | N/A |
FxPro vs Trading 212 Stock Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
- All four major platforms (MT4, MT5, cTrader, FXPro Direct) support equity CFDs
- FCA and CySEC regulated with FSCS protection for UK clients
- No minimum deposit; no inactivity fee
- Algorithmic traders can deploy EAs/cBots on share CFDs within existing environments
Cons
- Narrowest stock selection (100+) among multi-platform regulated equity CFD brokers
FxPro vs Trading 212: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
4
FxPro
criteria wins
3
Trading 212
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | FxPro | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Pass | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Pass |
| No deposit fee | — | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Pass |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Pass |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Fail |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Fail |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Fail |
FxPro vs Trading 212: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: FxPro rates 3.8/5 and Trading 212 rates 4.2/5. Trading 212 has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
FxPro starts from 1.2. Current spread data is not available for Trading 212. Check both brokers' websites for up-to-date spread and commission pricing.
Trading 212 has $1, while FxPro requires at least $100. This makes Trading 212 more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Both FxPro and Trading 212 hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, two factors stand out: Trading 212 requires a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry, and both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
FxPro lists maximum leverage of 20:1, while Trading 212 lists up to 1:5. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
FxPro charges $7 per trade on commission-based accounts. Commission details for Trading 212 are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing. Stock commissions may be charged as a flat rate per trade or per share; confirm the exact structure on each broker's website.
FxPro supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, MetaTrader 4, while Trading 212 supports Trading 212 App. FxPro has exclusive access to cTrader and MetaTrader 5 and Proprietary Web/Mobile and MetaTrader 4. Trading 212 has exclusive access to Trading 212 App.
Trading 212 offers commission-free stock trading while FxPro does not according to our data. Commission-free trading can reduce costs for frequent traders. Always confirm the current fee structure directly on each broker's website.
Both FxPro and Trading 212 are covered by a compensation scheme according to our data, providing an additional safety net for your stock investments. Confirm the specific scheme and coverage limit that applies to your account before depositing.
