A head-to-head comparison of Tickmill and TPFx across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Among the lowest commissions available at $6 round-turn on Pro accounts, with strong FCA, CySEC, and FSCA regulation and transparent execution.
A fully BAPPEBTI-licensed and OJK-registered Indonesian broker, offering domestic traders compliant access to forex and commodity futures markets.
Tickmill comes out ahead with an editorial score of 4.3/5 compared to TPFx's 3.7/5.
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Tickmill offers tighter spreads from 0 pips vs 1.5 pips for TPFx, reducing trading costs.
Tickmill has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.
TPFx offers more exclusive platform options: Proprietary Web/Mobile, a proprietary platform.
Tickmill edges out TPFx with a higher editorial score (4.3/5 vs 3.7/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.
| Editorial score | 4.3/ 5 | 3.7/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.4 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.5 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 4.0 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
Customer Support 10% weight | 4.1 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
| Founded | 2014 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Jakarta, Indonesia |
| Min deposit | $100 | $60 |
| Spreads from | 0 pips | 1.5 pips |
| Commission / lot | $6/lot | N/A |
| Max leverage | 1000:1 | 100:1 |
| Withdrawal fee | Free | Free |
| Regulators | FCA FSCA CySEC | BAPPEBTI OJK |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 | MetaTrader 5 Proprietary Web/Mobile |
| Active bonuses | ||
| Visit broker | Visit Tickmill | Visit TPFx |
Pros
Industry-low commission of $6 round-turn on Pro account
Strong FCA, CySEC, and FSCA regulatory coverage
No dealing desk on Pro and Raw accounts
Negative balance protection for retail clients
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Investor compensation scheme coverage
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Pros
BAPPEBTI-licensed and OJK-registered - full Indonesian regulatory compliance
OJK registration no. S-130/PM.02/2025 is publicly verifiable
Supports MetaTrader 5 alongside proprietary platform
Local Indonesian bank transfer funding with IDR accounts
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Raw spread account available
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
Mobile trading app available
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Cons
No cTrader support
Limited asset classes compared to multi-asset peers
Not available to US residents
No proprietary platform
Cons
Only available to Indonesian residents - no international clients
Higher minimum deposit than some domestic peers
Narrow product range limited to forex and commodity futures
No top-tier regulatory licence
No negative balance protection
No investor compensation scheme
Limited charting capabilities
Support available in limited languages
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | Tickmill | TPFx |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Fail |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Pass | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Fail |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Fail |
Based on our independent editorial scoring, Tickmill ranks higher with a score of 4.3/5 vs 3.7/5 for TPFx. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; Tickmill and TPFx may each suit different trader profiles.
Tickmill offers tighter spreads starting from 0 pips, compared to TPFx's spreads from 1.5 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, particularly valuable for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
TPFx has a lower minimum deposit of $60, while Tickmill requires at least $100. This makes TPFx more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Tickmill holds top-tier regulation (FCA, FSCA, CySEC), providing stronger investor protections. TPFx may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Always verify regulatory status with the broker directly before depositing funds.
For beginners: TPFx has a lower minimum deposit ($60), lowering the barrier to entry; Tickmill offers negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.
Tickmill offers maximum leverage of 1000:1, while TPFx offers up to 100:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.
Tickmill charges $6 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for the other broker are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.
Tickmill supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and TPFx offers MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile; both support MetaTrader 5; Tickmill exclusively offers MetaTrader 4; TPFx exclusively offers Proprietary Web/Mobile.
Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.
Score 3.7 / 5
Personalised recommendation
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker