FBSvs
TPFxForex Broker Comparison
This comparison pits FBS against TPFx on regulation, pricing, and platforms. The axis of tension is instrument breadth versus domestic suitability.
Our Verdict
FBS winsby 0.2 pts
FBS offers a broader instrument range with 550 instruments versus 50 at TPFx. Overall, the brokers remain closely matched on regulation, pricing, and platforms.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1FBS offers 550 instruments versus 50 at TPFx.
- 2Multilingual support available on FBS but not on TPFx.
- 3TPFx provides a proprietary platform while FBS relies on MT4/MT5.
Who should choose FBS vs TPFx?
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
FBS offers tighter spreads from 0.00 pips vs 1.50 pips for TPFx, reducing trading costs.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
FBS vs TPFx: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 3.9/ 5 | 3.7/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 3.5 / 5 | 3.7 / 5▲ |
FBS vs TPFx Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
Very low $1 minimum deposit on Cent accounts
MT4 and MT5 on all account types
Multiple account types including Cent, Zero Spread, and ECN
Widely available across Southeast Asia, MENA, and Africa
Client funds held in segregated accounts
FBS vs TPFx: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
2
FBS
criteria wins
1
TPFx
criteria win
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | FBS | TPFx |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Fail |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Fail | Fail |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Fail |
FBS vs TPFx: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: FBS rates 3.9/5 and TPFx rates 3.7/5. FBS has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
FBS starts from 0 pips, tighter than TPFx's 1.5 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
FBS has $1, while TPFx requires at least $60. This makes FBS more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
FBS is regulated by FSCA, CySEC. TPFx is regulated by BAPPEBTI, OJK. Confirm a broker's current regulatory status on the relevant regulator's public register before opening an account.
FBS stands out for beginners: it has a lower entry point and provides negative balance protection, which caps losses at your deposited amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
FBS lists maximum leverage of 3000:1, while TPFx lists up to 100:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
FBS charges $20 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for TPFx are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.
FBS supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while TPFx supports MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile. Both provide MetaTrader 5. FBS has exclusive access to MetaTrader 4. TPFx has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile.
