FBS vs TPFx Forex Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of FBS and TPFx across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Offshore broker with CySEC and IFSC licensing, dominant in Southeast Asia and MENA through heavy localised marketing and generous bonuses - best evaluated on regulatory strength rather than promotion value.
VS
A fully BAPPEBTI-licensed and OJK-registered Indonesian broker, offering domestic traders compliant access to forex and commodity futures markets.
Our Verdict
FBS winsby 0.2 pts
FBS edges ahead with a score of 3.9/5 vs TPFx's 3.7/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
FBS offers tighter spreads from 0 pips vs 1.5 pips for TPFx, reducing trading costs.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
FBS has a stronger safety profile: segregated funds, negative balance protection.
Best for platform choice
Recommended
TPFx offers more exclusive platform options: Proprietary Web/Mobile, a proprietary platform.
Best for beginners
Recommended
FBS edges out TPFx with a higher editorial score (3.9/5 vs 3.7/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.
FBS vs TPFx: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 3.9/ 5 | 3.7/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 3.5 / 5 | 3.7 / 5▲ |
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.0 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 3.8 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
Customer Support 10% weight | 4.0 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
| Founded | 2009 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Belize City, Belize | Jakarta, Indonesia |
| Min deposit | $1 | $60 |
| Spreads from | 0 pips | 1.5 pips |
| Commission / lot | $20/lot | N/A |
| Max leverage | 3000:1 | 100:1 |
| Withdrawal fee | Free | Free |
| Regulators | FSCA CySEC IFSC | BAPPEBTI OJK |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 | MetaTrader 5 Proprietary Web/Mobile |
| Active bonuses | ||
| Visit broker | Visit FBS | Visit TPFx |
FBS vs TPFx Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
Very low $1 minimum deposit on Cent accounts
MT4 and MT5 on all account types
Multiple account types including Cent, Zero Spread, and ECN
Widely available across Southeast Asia, MENA, and Africa
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Pros
BAPPEBTI-licensed and OJK-registered - full Indonesian regulatory compliance
OJK registration no. S-130/PM.02/2025 is publicly verifiable
Supports MetaTrader 5 alongside proprietary platform
Local Indonesian bank transfer funding with IDR accounts
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Raw spread account available
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
Mobile trading app available
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Cons
Primary entity uses IFSC Belize - offshore, limited investor protection
Bonus turnover requirements are onerous
Very high leverage (3000:1) is a significant risk factor for retail clients
No top-tier regulatory licence
No investor compensation scheme
No proprietary platform
Limited charting capabilities
Cons
Only available to Indonesian residents - no international clients
Higher minimum deposit than some domestic peers
Narrow product range limited to forex and commodity futures
No top-tier regulatory licence
No negative balance protection
No investor compensation scheme
Limited charting capabilities
Support available in limited languages
FBS vs TPFx: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
2
FBS
criteria wins
1
TPFx
criteria win
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | FBS | TPFx |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Fail |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Fail | Fail |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Fail |
FBS vs TPFx: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, FBS ranks higher with a score of 3.9/5 vs 3.7/5 for TPFx. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; FBS and TPFx may each suit different trader profiles.
FBS offers tighter spreads starting from 0 pips, compared to TPFx's spreads from 1.5 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, particularly valuable for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
FBS has a lower minimum deposit of $1, while TPFx requires at least $60. This makes FBS more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
FBS is regulated by FSCA, CySEC. TPFx is regulated by BAPPEBTI, OJK. Always confirm a broker's current regulatory status before opening an account.
For beginners: FBS has a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry; FBS offers negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.
FBS offers maximum leverage of 3000:1, while TPFx offers up to 100:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.
FBS charges $20 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for the other broker are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.
FBS supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and TPFx offers MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile; both support MetaTrader 5; FBS exclusively offers MetaTrader 4; TPFx exclusively offers Proprietary Web/Mobile.
Ready to get started?
Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.
Score 3.7 / 5
More Broker Comparisons
More FBS comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker