BrokerDir.
Forex
Crypto
Stocks
BrokerDir.

The most trusted, data-dense directory for comparing regulated forex brokers worldwide.

Explore

  • All Brokers
  • Features
  • Bonuses
  • Learn
  • Markets
  • Tools
  • Glossary
  • Broker Warnings

Company

  • About Us
  • Our Methodology
  • How We Cover Brokers
  • Contact

© 2026 BrokerDir. All rights reserved.

High Risk Warning: Trading forex carries a high level of risk.

HomeForexCompare

AvaTrade vs FBS Forex Broker Comparison

A head-to-head comparison of AvaTrade and FBS across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.

AvaTrade

AvaTrade

Score 4.4 / 5
4 bonuses

Heavily regulated across 6+ jurisdictions with a unique AvaOptions platform for vanilla options trading and strong educational content.

Visit AvaTrade
VS
FBS

FBS

Score 3.9 / 5
2 bonuses

Offshore broker with CySEC and IFSC licensing, dominant in Southeast Asia and MENA through heavy localised marketing and generous bonuses - best evaluated on regulatory strength rather than promotion value.

Visit FBS
Our Verdict
AvaTrade winsClear Winner

AvaTrade comes out ahead with an editorial score of 4.4/5 compared to FBS's 3.9/5.

AvaTrade
4.4/5
FBS
3.9/5

Verdict by Trader Profile

Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.

Best for low cost trading
FBS
FBS
Recommended

FBS offers tighter spreads from 0 pips vs 0.9 pips for AvaTrade, reducing trading costs.

Best for safety & regulation
AvaTrade
AvaTrade
Recommended

AvaTrade has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, segregated funds, negative balance protection.

Best for active traders
FBS
FBS
Recommended

FBS has a cost edge: raw/ECN spreads, tighter spreads from 0 pips.

Best for platform choice
AvaTrade
AvaTrade
Recommended

AvaTrade offers more exclusive platform options: Proprietary Web/Mobile, a proprietary platform.

Best for beginners
AvaTrade
AvaTrade
Recommended

AvaTrade edges out FBS with a higher editorial score (4.4/5 vs 3.9/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.

AvaTrade vs FBS: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison

Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category
AvaTradeAvaTrade
FBSFBS
Editorial score
4.4/ 5
3.9/ 5
Score Breakdown
Trust & Regulation
40% weight
4.4 / 5▲
3.5 / 5
Fees & Spreads
30% weight
4.4 / 5▲
4.0 / 5
Platforms & Tools
20% weight
4.3 / 5▲
3.8 / 5
Customer Support
10% weight
4.4 / 5▲
4.0 / 5
Founded20062009
HeadquartersDublin, IrelandBelize City, Belize
Min deposit$100$1
Spreads from0.9 pips0 pips
Commission / lotN/A$20/lot
Max leverage400:13000:1
Withdrawal feeFreeFree
Regulators
FSCA
ASIC
ADGM
CBI
MFSA
FSCA
CySEC
IFSC
Platforms
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
Proprietary Web/Mobile
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
Active bonuses
Visit brokerVisit AvaTrade Visit FBS

AvaTrade vs FBS Forex Broker Pros & Cons

AvaTradeAvaTrade
FBSFBS

Pros

Heavily regulated across 6+ jurisdictions

AvaOptions platform for vanilla options trading

Strong educational content and structured courses

Multiple platforms including MT4, MT5 and proprietary AvaTradeGo

Regulated by top-tier authorities (FCA, ASIC, CySEC)

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Negative balance protection

No deposit fees

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Advanced charting tools included

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Multilingual customer support

Pros

Very low $1 minimum deposit on Cent accounts

MT4 and MT5 on all account types

Multiple account types including Cent, Zero Spread, and ECN

Widely available across Southeast Asia, MENA, and Africa

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Negative balance protection

No deposit fees

No inactivity fee

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Multilingual customer support

Cons

Inactivity fee of $50 after 3 months of no trading

Not available to US residents

Spread-only model means no raw ECN pricing

No investor compensation scheme

Cons

Primary entity uses IFSC Belize - offshore, limited investor protection

Bonus turnover requirements are onerous

Very high leverage (3000:1) is a significant risk factor for retail clients

No top-tier regulatory licence

No investor compensation scheme

No proprietary platform

Limited charting capabilities

AvaTrade vs FBS: Detailed Category Breakdown

A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.

3
AvaTrade
criteria wins
Ahead
2
FBS
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
CriteriaAvaTradeFBS
Trust & Regulation
Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.)
Pass
Fail
Segregated client funds
Pass
Pass
Negative balance protection
Pass
Pass
Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS)
Fail
Fail
Fees & Spreads
Raw/ECN spreads available
Fail
Pass
No deposit fee
Pass
Pass
No inactivity fee
Fail
Pass
Transparent pricing page
Pass
Pass
Platforms & Tools
MT4/MT5 available
Pass
Pass
Proprietary platform
Pass
Fail
Mobile app
Pass
Pass
Advanced charting tools
Pass
Fail
Customer Support
24/5 live chat
Pass
Pass
Phone support
Pass
Pass
Multilingual support
Pass
Pass

AvaTrade vs FBS: Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our independent editorial scoring, AvaTrade ranks higher with a score of 4.4/5 vs 3.9/5 for FBS. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; AvaTrade and FBS may each suit different trader profiles.

FBS offers tighter spreads starting from 0 pips, compared to AvaTrade's spreads from 0.9 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, particularly valuable for high-frequency and scalping strategies.

FBS has a lower minimum deposit of $1, while AvaTrade requires at least $100. This makes FBS more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.

AvaTrade holds top-tier regulation (FSCA, ASIC, ADGM), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Always verify regulatory status with the broker directly before depositing funds.

For beginners: FBS has a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry; both brokers offer negative balance protection. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.

AvaTrade offers maximum leverage of 400:1, while FBS offers up to 3000:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.

FBS charges $20 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for the other broker are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.

AvaTrade supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile and FBS offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5; both support MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5; AvaTrade exclusively offers Proprietary Web/Mobile.

Ready to get started?

Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.

Editor's Pick
AvaTrade

AvaTrade

Score 4.4 / 5

Visit AvaTrade
FBS

FBS

Score 3.9 / 5

Visit FBS

More Broker Comparisons

More AvaTrade comparisons

Windsor Brokers

AvaTradevsWindsor Brokers

HFM

AvaTradevsHFM

Exness

AvaTradevsExness

Alpari International

AvaTradevsAlpari International

FXTM

AvaTradevsFXTM

RoboForex

AvaTradevsRoboForex

Tickmill

AvaTradevsTickmill

XM

AvaTradevsXM

OctaFX

AvaTradevsOctaFX

Admirals

AvaTradevsAdmirals

More FBS comparisons

Moneta Markets

FBSvsMoneta Markets

Forex.com

FBSvsForex.com

easyMarkets

FBSvseasyMarkets

Swissquote

FBSvsSwissquote

FxPro

FBSvsFxPro

ADS Securities

FBSvsADS Securities

Libertex

FBSvsLibertex

Vantage

FBSvsVantage

Tickmill

FBSvsTickmill

Admirals

FBSvsAdmirals

Personalised recommendation

Not sure which broker is right for you?

Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.

Find my broker