Two brokers clash over regulation depth, cost structures, and platform options, stirring a debate between global rules and domestic access.
FXOpen tops the editorial score and holds FCA, CySEC and ASIC; TPFx trails with Indonesian regulators.
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
FXOpen offers tighter spreads from 0.00 pips vs 1.50 pips for TPFx, reducing trading costs.
| Editorial score | 4.2/ 5 | 3.7/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.5 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
Pros
FCA, CySEC, and ASIC triple regulation
$3 round-turn ECN commission, one of the lowest in retail forex
Early cTrader adopter with mature integration
MT4, MT5, and cTrader all available
Client funds held in segregated accounts
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | FXOpen | TPFx |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Fail |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Pass | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Fail |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Fail | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Fail |
FXOpen rates 4.2/5 versus 3.7/5 for TPFx. FXOpen edges ahead on our composite score, though both brokers meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
FXOpen starts from 0 pips, tighter than TPFx's 1.5 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
TPFx has $60, while FXOpen requires at least $100. This makes TPFx more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
FXOpen holds top-tier regulation (FCA, ASIC, CySEC), providing stronger investor protections. TPFx may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, two factors stand out: TPFx requires a lower minimum deposit ($60), lowering the barrier to entry, and FXOpen provides negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
FXOpen lists maximum leverage of 500:1, while TPFx lists up to 100:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
FXOpen charges $3 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for TPFx are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.
FXOpen supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while TPFx supports MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile. Both provide MetaTrader 5. FXOpen has exclusive access to cTrader and MetaTrader 4. TPFx has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile.
FXOpen wins for safety and regulation due to FCA, CySEC, and ASIC oversight.
FXOpen wins for active traders with ECN pricing and low $3/lot commission.
FXOpen is better suited for scalpers: tighter spreads from 0.00 pips.
FXOpen wins with 700 instruments across multiple asset classes.
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.8 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
|---|
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 4.4 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
|---|
Customer Support 10% weight | 4.0 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
|---|
| Founded | 2003 | 2010 |
|---|
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Jakarta, Indonesia |
|---|
| Min Deposit | $100 | $60▼ lower |
|---|
| Spreads From | 0 pips▼ lower | 1.5 pips |
|---|
| Commission / lot | $3/lot | N/A |
|---|
| 0.3 pips | N/A |
| Max Leverage | 500:1▲ higher | 100:1 |
|---|
| Inactivity Fee | None | None |
|---|
| Deposit Fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Deposit methods | Bank transferCredit cardDebit cardSkrillNetellerCrypto | Bank transferCredit cardDebit card |
|---|
| Withdrawal methods | Bank transferCredit cardSkrillNetellerCrypto | Bank transfer |
|---|
| Withdrawal Fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Regulators | FCA ASIC CySEC | BAPPEBTI OJK |
|---|
| Platforms | cTrader MetaTrader 5 MetaTrader 4 | MetaTrader 5 Proprietary Web/Mobile |
|---|
| Active bonuses |
|---|
Negative balance protection
Investor compensation scheme coverage
Raw spread account available
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Multilingual customer support
Pros
BAPPEBTI-licensed and OJK-registered, full Indonesian regulatory compliance
OJK registration no. S-130/PM.02/2025 is publicly verifiable
Supports MetaTrader 5 alongside proprietary platform
Local Indonesian bank transfer funding with IDR accounts
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Raw spread account available
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
Mobile trading app available
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Cons
$100 minimum deposit on ECN accounts
Less brand recognition than larger competitors
Customer support coverage narrower than global tier-1 brokers
No proprietary platform
No phone support
Cons
Only available to Indonesian residents, no international clients
Higher minimum deposit than some domestic peers
Narrow product range limited to forex and commodity futures
No top-tier regulatory licence
No negative balance protection
No investor compensation scheme
Limited charting capabilities
Support available in limited languages
Dig deeper into each broker’s features, fees, and regulation.
Score 3.7 / 5
Personalised recommendation
Answer 6 quick questions and we’ll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker