Fusion Markets vs TPFx Forex Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of Fusion Markets and TPFx across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Score 4.2 / 5
2 bonusesOne of the lowest-cost ECN brokers globally at $4.50/lot, no minimum deposit, and three platform options - strong value for cost-conscious traders.
VS
A fully BAPPEBTI-licensed and OJK-registered Indonesian broker, offering domestic traders compliant access to forex and commodity futures markets.
Our Verdict
Fusion Markets winsby 0.5 pts
Fusion Markets edges ahead with a score of 4.2/5 vs TPFx's 3.7/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
Fusion Markets offers tighter spreads from 0 pips vs 1.5 pips for TPFx, reducing trading costs.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
Fusion Markets has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, segregated funds, negative balance protection.
Best for active traders
Recommended
Fusion Markets has a cost edge: tighter spreads from 0 pips.
Best for platform choice
Recommended
TPFx offers more exclusive platform options: Proprietary Web/Mobile, a proprietary platform.
Best for beginners
Recommended
Fusion Markets edges out TPFx with a higher editorial score (4.2/5 vs 3.7/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.
Fusion Markets vs TPFx: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 4.2/ 5 | 3.7/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.2 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.5 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 3.9 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
Customer Support 10% weight | 3.8 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
| Founded | 2017 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Melbourne, Australia | Jakarta, Indonesia |
| Min deposit | No minimum | $60 |
| Spreads from | 0 pips | 1.5 pips |
| Commission / lot | $4.5/lot | N/A |
| Max leverage | 500:1 | 100:1 |
| Withdrawal fee | Free | Free |
| Regulators | ASIC VFSC | BAPPEBTI OJK |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader | MetaTrader 5 Proprietary Web/Mobile |
| Active bonuses | ||
| Visit broker | Visit Fusion Markets | Visit TPFx |
Fusion Markets vs TPFx Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
Among the lowest ECN commissions globally at $4.50/lot round-turn
No minimum deposit and no inactivity fee
Supports MT4, MT5, and cTrader
ASIC regulated with strong Australian broker infrastructure
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
Raw spread account available
No deposit fees
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
Pros
BAPPEBTI-licensed and OJK-registered - full Indonesian regulatory compliance
OJK registration no. S-130/PM.02/2025 is publicly verifiable
Supports MetaTrader 5 alongside proprietary platform
Local Indonesian bank transfer funding with IDR accounts
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Raw spread account available
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
Mobile trading app available
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Cons
Smaller, newer broker (est. 2017) with limited global brand recognition
Limited research and educational content
VFSC license used for non-AU clients offers fewer protections
No investor compensation scheme
No proprietary platform
Limited charting capabilities
No 24/5 live chat
No phone support
Support available in limited languages
Cons
Only available to Indonesian residents - no international clients
Higher minimum deposit than some domestic peers
Narrow product range limited to forex and commodity futures
No top-tier regulatory licence
No negative balance protection
No investor compensation scheme
Limited charting capabilities
Support available in limited languages
Fusion Markets vs TPFx: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
2
Fusion Markets
criteria wins
3
TPFx
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | Fusion Markets | TPFx |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Fail |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Fail | Fail |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Fail | Pass |
| Phone support | Fail | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Fail | Fail |
Fusion Markets vs TPFx: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, Fusion Markets ranks higher with a score of 4.2/5 vs 3.7/5 for TPFx. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; Fusion Markets and TPFx may each suit different trader profiles.
Fusion Markets offers tighter spreads starting from 0 pips, compared to TPFx's spreads from 1.5 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, particularly valuable for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
Fusion Markets has a lower minimum deposit of no minimum required, while TPFx requires at least $60. This makes Fusion Markets more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Fusion Markets holds top-tier regulation (ASIC, VFSC), providing stronger investor protections. TPFx may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Always verify regulatory status with the broker directly before depositing funds.
For beginners: Fusion Markets has a lower minimum deposit (no minimum), lowering the barrier to entry; Fusion Markets offers negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.
Fusion Markets offers maximum leverage of 500:1, while TPFx offers up to 100:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.
Fusion Markets charges $4.5 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for the other broker are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.
Fusion Markets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader and TPFx offers MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile; both support MetaTrader 5; Fusion Markets exclusively offers MetaTrader 4, cTrader; TPFx exclusively offers Proprietary Web/Mobile.
Ready to get started?
Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.
Score 3.7 / 5
More Broker Comparisons
More Fusion Markets comparisons
More TPFx comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker