Two brokers compete on regulation, pricing, and platform ecosystems, highlighting divergent approaches to safety, accessibility, and tech tools.
OANDA edges TPFx in overall editorial score due to top-tier regulation and broader instrument coverage. It also offers advanced charting that TPFx lacks.
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
OANDA offers tighter spreads from 1.00 pips vs 1.50 pips for TPFx, reducing trading costs.
| Editorial score | 4.6/ 5 | 3.7/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.8 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
Pros
Available to US residents (NFA-registered)
Best-in-class research and economic data
No minimum deposit
MT4, MT5 and proprietary platforms
Regulated by top-tier authorities (FCA, ASIC, CySEC)
Client funds held in segregated accounts
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | OANDA | TPFx |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Fail |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Pass | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Fail | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Pass | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Fail |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Fail |
OANDA rates 4.6/5 versus 3.7/5 for TPFx. OANDA edges ahead on our composite score, though both brokers meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
OANDA starts from 1 pips, tighter than TPFx's 1.5 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
OANDA has no minimum deposit, while TPFx requires at least $60. This makes OANDA more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
OANDA holds top-tier regulation (FCA, ASIC, CBI), providing stronger investor protections. TPFx may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
OANDA stands out for beginners: it has a lower entry point and provides negative balance protection, which caps losses at your deposited amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
OANDA lists maximum leverage of 50:1, while TPFx lists up to 100:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
OANDA supports MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, TradingView, MetaTrader 4, while TPFx supports MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and Proprietary Web/Mobile. OANDA has exclusive access to TradingView and MetaTrader 4.
OANDA wins for safety and regulation with top-tier authorities and client fund protections.
OANDA wins for active traders with MT4/MT5 access and robust charting across 70 instruments.
TPFx is better suited for scalpers: raw/ECN spreads available.
OANDA wins for platform choice with MT4/MT5 and proprietary web/mobile platforms.
OANDA wins for beginners with zero minimum deposit and strong regulation.
OANDA wins for instrument variety with 70 instruments to trade.
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.5 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
|---|
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 4.6 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
|---|
Customer Support 10% weight | 4.3 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
|---|
| Founded | 1996 | 2010 |
|---|
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Jakarta, Indonesia |
|---|
| Min Deposit | No minimum▼ lower | $60 |
|---|
| Spreads From | 1 pips▼ lower | 1.5 pips |
|---|
| Commission / lot | N/A | N/A |
|---|
| Max Leverage | 50:1▲ higher | 100:1 |
|---|
| Inactivity Fee | $10/month (after 12 months) | None |
|---|
| Deposit Fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Deposit methods | Bank transferCredit cardDebit card | Bank transferCredit cardDebit card |
|---|
| Withdrawal methods | Bank transferDebit card | Bank transfer |
|---|
| Withdrawal Fee | Free for ACH | Free |
|---|
| Regulators | FCA ASIC CBI CMF NFA | BAPPEBTI OJK |
|---|
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5 Proprietary Web/Mobile TradingView MetaTrader 4 | MetaTrader 5 Proprietary Web/Mobile |
|---|
| Active bonuses |
|---|
Negative balance protection
Investor compensation scheme coverage
No deposit fees
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Pros
BAPPEBTI-licensed and OJK-registered, full Indonesian regulatory compliance
OJK registration no. S-130/PM.02/2025 is publicly verifiable
Supports MetaTrader 5 alongside proprietary platform
Local Indonesian bank transfer funding with IDR accounts
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Raw spread account available
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
Mobile trading app available
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Cons
Spreads slightly wider than ECN-style brokers
No copy trading
No raw spread account option
Inactivity fee applies
Cons
Only available to Indonesian residents, no international clients
Higher minimum deposit than some domestic peers
Narrow product range limited to forex and commodity futures
No top-tier regulatory licence
No negative balance protection
No investor compensation scheme
Limited charting capabilities
Support available in limited languages
Dig deeper into each broker’s features, fees, and regulation.
Score 3.7 / 5
Personalised recommendation
Answer 6 quick questions and we’ll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker