ACY Securities and TPFx face off on regulation, pricing, and platform ecosystems. The matchup highlights instrument breadth versus regional access and proprietary technology.
ACY Securities edges TPFx on the overall score. Its broader instrument access and ASIC regulation support a stronger overall proposition.
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose ACY Securities if…
Choose ACY Securities if you want broad instrument access and transparent raw spreads. You also get ASIC regulation with segregated funds and negative balance protection.
Choose TPFx if…
Choose TPFx if you want MT5 alongside a proprietary platform and Indonesian regulatory alignment. You access services for Indonesian residents only.
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
ACY Securities offers tighter spreads from 0.00 pips vs 1.50 pips for TPFx, reducing trading costs.
| Editorial score | 4.0/ 5 | 3.7/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.3 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
Pros
2,200+ instruments including share CFDs and ETF CFDs
TradingView integration for browser-based chart execution
ASIC regulated with Tier 1 investor protections
Raw ECN spreads from 0.0 pips at $7 round-turn commission
Client funds held in segregated accounts
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | ACY Securities | TPFx |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Fail |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Fail |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Fail |
The scores are close: ACY Securities rates 4/5 and TPFx rates 3.7/5. ACY Securities has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
ACY Securities starts from 0 pips, tighter than TPFx's 1.5 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
ACY Securities has $50, while TPFx requires at least $60. This makes ACY Securities more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
ACY Securities holds top-tier regulation (ASIC, FSA Seychelles), providing stronger investor protections. TPFx may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
ACY Securities stands out for beginners: it has a lower entry point and provides negative balance protection, which caps losses at your deposited amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
ACY Securities lists maximum leverage of 500:1, while TPFx lists up to 100:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
ACY Securities charges $7 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for TPFx are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.
ACY Securities supports MetaTrader 5, TradingView, MetaTrader 4, while TPFx supports MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile. Both provide MetaTrader 5. ACY Securities has exclusive access to TradingView and MetaTrader 4. TPFx has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile.
ACY Securities wins for safety and regulation with ASIC oversight and segregated funds.
ACY Securities offers broad instrument variety and raw ECN pricing for active traders.
ACY Securities is better suited for scalpers: tighter spreads from 0.00 pips.
ACY Securities offers MT4/MT5 and TradingView, providing broader platform options than TPFx.
ACY Securities suits beginners with ASIC protections and diverse instrument access.
ACY Securities wins for instrument variety with 2,200+ instruments.
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.3 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
|---|
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 4.2 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
|---|
Customer Support 10% weight | 3.9 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
|---|
| Founded | 2011 | 2010 |
|---|
| Headquarters | Sydney, Australia | Jakarta, Indonesia |
|---|
| Min Deposit | $50▼ lower | $60 |
|---|
| Spreads From | 0 pips▼ lower | 1.5 pips |
|---|
| Commission / lot | $7/lot | N/A |
|---|
| 0.7 pips | N/A |
| Max Leverage | 500:1▲ higher | 100:1 |
|---|
| Inactivity Fee | None | None |
|---|
| Deposit Fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Deposit methods | Bank transferCredit cardDebit cardCrypto | Bank transferCredit cardDebit card |
|---|
| Withdrawal methods | Bank transferCredit cardCrypto | Bank transfer |
|---|
| Withdrawal Fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Regulators | ASIC FSA Seychelles | BAPPEBTI OJK |
|---|
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5 TradingView MetaTrader 4 | MetaTrader 5 Proprietary Web/Mobile |
|---|
| Active bonuses |
|---|
Negative balance protection
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Pros
BAPPEBTI-licensed and OJK-registered, full Indonesian regulatory compliance
OJK registration no. S-130/PM.02/2025 is publicly verifiable
Supports MetaTrader 5 alongside proprietary platform
Local Indonesian bank transfer funding with IDR accounts
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Raw spread account available
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
Mobile trading app available
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Cons
$200 minimum for ECN Ultra account
Less established brand than IC Markets or Pepperstone in Australia
Limited proprietary tools
No investor compensation scheme
No proprietary platform
Cons
Only available to Indonesian residents, no international clients
Higher minimum deposit than some domestic peers
Narrow product range limited to forex and commodity futures
No top-tier regulatory licence
No negative balance protection
No investor compensation scheme
Limited charting capabilities
Support available in limited languages
Dig deeper into each broker’s features, fees, and regulation.
Score 3.7 / 5
Personalised recommendation
Answer 6 quick questions and we’ll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker