Moneta Markets vs OANDA Forex Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of Moneta Markets and OANDA across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Score 4.1 / 5
2 bonusesMulti-regulated broker with ASIC, FSCA, and FSA Seychelles licences, offering competitive raw ECN conditions and a proprietary platform alongside MT4 and MT5 - growing presence in Africa and Asian markets.
VS
NFA- and FCA-regulated with strong US/UK coverage, transparent historical pricing, and excellent research.
Our Verdict
OANDA winsby 0.5 pts
OANDA edges ahead with a score of 4.6/5 vs Moneta Markets's 4.1/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
Moneta Markets offers tighter spreads from 0 pips vs 1 pips for OANDA, reducing trading costs.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
OANDA has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.
Best for active traders
Recommended
Moneta Markets has a cost edge: raw/ECN spreads, tighter spreads from 0 pips.
Best for platform choice
Recommended
OANDA offers more exclusive platform options: TradingView, a proprietary platform.
Best for beginners
Recommended
OANDA edges out Moneta Markets with a higher editorial score (4.6/5 vs 4.1/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.
Moneta Markets vs OANDA: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 4.1/ 5 | 4.6/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.1 / 5 | 4.8 / 5▲ |
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.4 / 5 | 4.5 / 5▲ |
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 4.0 / 5 | 4.6 / 5▲ |
Customer Support 10% weight | 4.0 / 5 | 4.3 / 5▲ |
| Founded | 2019 | 1996 |
| Headquarters | Sydney, Australia | New York, United States |
| Min deposit | $50 | No minimum |
| Spreads from | 0 pips | 1 pips |
| Commission / lot | $6/lot | N/A |
| Max leverage | 1000:1 | 50:1 |
| Withdrawal fee | Free | Free for ACH |
| Regulators | FSCA ASIC FSA Seychelles | FCA CMF ASIC NFA CBI |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 Proprietary Web/Mobile | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 Proprietary Web/Mobile TradingView |
| Active bonuses | ||
| Visit broker | Visit Moneta Markets | Visit OANDA |
Moneta Markets vs OANDA Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
ASIC, FSCA, and FSA Seychelles licensing - choice of regulatory framework
Pro ECN account: 0.0 pip spreads with $6 commission
MT4, MT5, and proprietary AppTrader platform
Strong localisation for Africa and Asia
Regulated by top-tier authorities (FCA, ASIC, CySEC)
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Pros
Available to US residents (NFA-registered)
Best-in-class research and economic data
No minimum deposit
MT4, MT5 and proprietary platforms
Regulated by top-tier authorities (FCA, ASIC, CySEC)
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
Investor compensation scheme coverage
No deposit fees
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Cons
Founded 2019 - limited track record vs established competitors
Lower brand recognition outside Africa and Asia
FSA Seychelles entity offers limited investor protection
No investor compensation scheme
Cons
Spreads slightly wider than ECN-style brokers
No copy trading
No raw spread account option
Inactivity fee applies
Moneta Markets vs OANDA: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
2
Moneta Markets
criteria wins
1
OANDA
criteria win
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | Moneta Markets | OANDA |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Fail |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Pass | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
Moneta Markets vs OANDA: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, OANDA ranks higher with a score of 4.6/5 vs 4.1/5 for Moneta Markets. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; Moneta Markets and OANDA may each suit different trader profiles.
Moneta Markets offers tighter spreads starting from 0 pips, compared to OANDA's spreads from 1 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, particularly valuable for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
OANDA has a lower minimum deposit of no minimum required, while Moneta Markets requires at least $50. This makes OANDA more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Both Moneta Markets and OANDA hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Both are considered safe. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners: OANDA has a lower minimum deposit (no minimum), lowering the barrier to entry; both brokers offer negative balance protection. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.
Moneta Markets offers maximum leverage of 1000:1, while OANDA offers up to 50:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.
Moneta Markets charges $6 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for the other broker are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.
Moneta Markets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile and OANDA offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, TradingView; both support MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile; OANDA exclusively offers TradingView.
Ready to get started?
Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.
Score 4.1 / 5
More Broker Comparisons
More Moneta Markets comparisons
More OANDA comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker