Two multi-regulated brokers face off on trust, cost, and platform options. The tension centers on regulation breadth, pricing, and available trading tools.
Pepperstone leads overall, with a higher editorial score and broader regulator coverage plus investor compensation. Moneta Markets remains strong on raw ECN pricing and MT4/MT5 access.
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose Moneta Markets if…
Choose Moneta Markets if you want a proprietary AppTrader platform in addition to MT4 and MT5. You also access higher leverage up to 1000:1 and a $50 minimum deposit.
Choose Pepperstone if…
Choose Pepperstone if you value a broad regulator set and investor compensation coverage. You also access MT4/MT5, cTrader, TradingView, and IRESS with a $0 minimum deposit.
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Both brokers offer spreads from 0.00 pips.
| Editorial score | 4.1/ 5 | 4.7/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.1 / 5 | 4.8 / 5▲ |
Pros
ASIC, FSCA, and FSA Seychelles licensing, choice of regulatory framework
Pro ECN account: 0.0 pip spreads with $6 commission
MT4, MT5, and proprietary AppTrader platform
Strong localisation for Africa and Asia
Regulated by top-tier authorities (FCA, ASIC, CySEC)
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | Moneta Markets | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Pass | Fail |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
Pepperstone rates 4.7/5 versus 4.1/5 for Moneta Markets. Pepperstone edges ahead on our composite score, though both brokers meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
Both Moneta Markets and Pepperstone start from 0 pips, making them equivalent on this metric. Compare commissions and account types to evaluate total trading costs.
Pepperstone has no minimum deposit, while Moneta Markets requires at least $50. This makes Pepperstone more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Both Moneta Markets and Pepperstone hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, two factors stand out: Pepperstone has no minimum deposit, removing the capital barrier entirely, and both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
Moneta Markets lists maximum leverage of 1000:1, while Pepperstone lists up to 500:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
Moneta Markets charges $6 per lot, lower than Pepperstone's $7 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.
Moneta Markets supports MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, MetaTrader 4, while Pepperstone supports cTrader, IRESS, MetaTrader 5, TradingView, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. Moneta Markets has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile. Pepperstone has exclusive access to cTrader and IRESS and TradingView.
Pepperstone wins safety & regulation due to broader oversight.
Pepperstone wins for active traders with diverse platforms.
Moneta Markets is better suited for scalpers: lower commission ($6/lot).
Pepperstone wins platform choice with MT4/MT5, cTrader, TradingView.
Pepperstone wins instrument variety with 1200 instruments.
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.4 / 5 | 4.8 / 5▲ |
|---|
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 4.0 / 5 | 4.6 / 5▲ |
|---|
Customer Support 10% weight | 4.0 / 5 | 4.6 / 5▲ |
|---|
| Founded | 2019 | 2010 |
|---|
| Headquarters | Sydney, Australia | Melbourne, Australia |
|---|
| Min Deposit | $50 | No minimum▼ lower |
|---|
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
|---|
| Commission / lot | $6/lot▼ lower | $7/lot |
|---|
| 0.6 pips▼ lower | 0.7 pips |
| Max Leverage | 1,000:1 | 500:1▲ higher |
|---|
| Inactivity Fee | None | None |
|---|
| Deposit Fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Deposit methods | Bank transferCredit cardDebit cardSkrillNeteller | Bank transferCredit cardDebit cardPayPalSkrill |
|---|
| Withdrawal methods | Bank transferCredit cardSkrillNeteller | Bank transferCredit cardPayPalSkrill |
|---|
| Withdrawal Fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Regulators | ASIC FSCA FSA Seychelles | FCA ASIC DFSA FMA BaFin CySEC |
|---|
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5 Proprietary Web/Mobile MetaTrader 4 | cTrader IRESS MetaTrader 5 TradingView MetaTrader 4 |
|---|
| Active bonuses |
|---|
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Pros
FCA, ASIC, BaFin, CySEC, DFSA licensed
Razor account: tight spreads + transparent commission
TradingView + MT4 / MT5 / cTrader
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
Investor compensation scheme coverage
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Cons
Founded 2019, limited track record vs established competitors
Lower brand recognition outside Africa and Asia
FSA Seychelles entity offers limited investor protection
No investor compensation scheme
Cons
Not available to US residents
No proprietary platform
Dig deeper into each broker’s features, fees, and regulation.
Score 4.1 / 5
Personalised recommendation
Answer 6 quick questions and we’ll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker