IC Markets and Pepperstone face off on regulation quality, costs, and platform ecosystems. The clash highlights different priorities for traders.
IC Markets and Pepperstone are closely matched overall, but IC Markets offers a larger instrument universe (2200 vs 1200).
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose IC Markets if…
Choose IC Markets if you want a $200 minimum deposit and a broad instrument universe.
Choose Pepperstone if…
Choose Pepperstone if you prefer a $0 minimum deposit and you value multi regulator oversight with IRESS access.
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Both brokers offer spreads from 0.00 pips.
| Editorial score | 4.7/ 5 | 4.7/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.6 / 5 | 4.8 / 5▲ |
Pros
True ECN routing with raw 0.0 pip spreads
All three major platforms (MT4, MT5, cTrader)
Deep liquidity from 25+ tier-1 sources
Regulated by top-tier authorities (FCA, ASIC, CySEC)
Client funds held in segregated accounts
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | IC Markets | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Pass | Pass |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Fail |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
IC Markets and Pepperstone share the same editorial score of 4.7/5. One concrete differentiator: Pepperstone requires a lower minimum deposit.
Both IC Markets and Pepperstone start from 0 pips, making them equivalent on this metric. Compare commissions and account types to evaluate total trading costs.
Pepperstone has no minimum deposit, while IC Markets requires at least $200. This makes Pepperstone more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Both IC Markets and Pepperstone hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, two factors stand out: Pepperstone has no minimum deposit, removing the capital barrier entirely, and both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
IC Markets lists maximum leverage of 500:1, while Pepperstone lists up to 500:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
Both IC Markets and Pepperstone charge the same commission of $7 per lot on applicable accounts.
IC Markets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, TradingView, MetaTrader 4, while Pepperstone supports cTrader, IRESS, MetaTrader 5, TradingView, MetaTrader 4. Both provide cTrader and MetaTrader 5 and TradingView and MetaTrader 4. Pepperstone has exclusive access to IRESS.
Pepperstone is regulated by FCA, ASIC, BaFin, CySEC, DFSA.
Pepperstone wins for active traders with Razor accounts and rebates.
Both brokers offer equivalent ECN conditions including raw spread accounts, commissions, and spread levels.
Pepperstone wins for platform choice with MT4/MT5/cTrader/TradingView and IRESS.
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 5.0 / 5▲ | 4.8 / 5 |
|---|
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 4.6 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 |
|---|
Customer Support 10% weight | 4.5 / 5 | 4.6 / 5▲ |
|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2010 |
|---|
| Headquarters | Sydney, Australia | Melbourne, Australia |
|---|
| Min Deposit | $200 | No minimum▼ lower |
|---|
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
|---|
| Commission / lot | $7/lot | $7/lot |
|---|
| 0.7 pips | 0.7 pips |
| Max Leverage | 500:1 | 500:1 |
|---|
| Inactivity Fee | None | None |
|---|
| Deposit Fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Deposit methods | Bank transferCredit cardDebit cardSkrillNetellerPayPal | Bank transferCredit cardDebit cardPayPalSkrill |
|---|
| Withdrawal methods | Bank transferCredit cardSkrillNeteller | Bank transferCredit cardPayPalSkrill |
|---|
| Withdrawal Fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Regulators | ASIC FSCA CySEC | FCA ASIC DFSA FMA BaFin CySEC |
|---|
| Platforms | cTrader MetaTrader 5 TradingView MetaTrader 4 | cTrader IRESS MetaTrader 5 TradingView MetaTrader 4 |
|---|
| Active bonuses |
|---|
Negative balance protection
Investor compensation scheme coverage
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Pros
FCA, ASIC, BaFin, CySEC, DFSA licensed
Razor account: tight spreads + transparent commission
TradingView + MT4 / MT5 / cTrader
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
Investor compensation scheme coverage
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Cons
Not available to US residents
Higher minimum deposit than IG/OANDA
No proprietary platform
Cons
Not available to US residents
No proprietary platform
Dig deeper into each broker’s features, fees, and regulation.
Score 4.7 / 5
Score 4.7 / 5
Personalised recommendation
Answer 6 quick questions and we’ll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker