BrokerDir.
Forex
Crypto
Stocks
BrokerDir.

The most trusted, data-dense directory for comparing regulated forex brokers worldwide.

Explore

  • All Brokers
  • Features
  • Bonuses
  • Learn
  • Markets
  • Tools
  • Glossary
  • Broker Warnings

Company

  • About Us
  • Our Methodology
  • How We Cover Brokers
  • Contact

© 2026 BrokerDir. All rights reserved.

High Risk Warning: Trading forex carries a high level of risk.

HomeForexCompare

FP Markets vs Pepperstone Forex Broker Comparison

A head-to-head comparison of FP Markets and Pepperstone across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.

FP Markets

FP Markets

Score 4.5 / 5
4 bonuses

True ECN pricing, all three major platforms, strong ASIC regulation, and IRESS integration for share CFDs - a complete package for active traders.

Visit FP Markets
VS
Pepperstone

Pepperstone

Score 4.7 / 5
4 bonuses

Multi-regulated Australian ECN-style broker with fast execution, MT4 / MT5 / cTrader / TradingView and a strong active-trader rebate program.

Visit Pepperstone
Our Verdict
Pepperstone winsby 0.2 pts

Pepperstone edges ahead with a score of 4.7/5 vs FP Markets's 4.5/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.

Verdict by Trader Profile

Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.

Best for low cost trading
It's a tie
Both equally suited

Both brokers offer spreads from 0 pips.

Best for safety & regulation
It's a tie
Both equally suited

Both brokers show an equally strong safety profile across regulation, fund protection, and client safeguards.

Best for active traders
FP Markets
FP Markets
Recommended

FP Markets has a cost edge: lower commission ($6/lot).

Best for beginners
Pepperstone
Pepperstone
Recommended

Pepperstone edges out FP Markets with a higher editorial score (4.7/5 vs 4.5/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.

FP Markets vs Pepperstone: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison

Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category
FP MarketsFP Markets
PepperstonePepperstone
Editorial score
4.5/ 5
4.7/ 5
Score Breakdown
Trust & Regulation
40% weight
4.6 / 5
4.8 / 5▲
Fees & Spreads
30% weight
4.5 / 5
4.8 / 5▲
Platforms & Tools
20% weight
4.4 / 5
4.6 / 5▲
Customer Support
10% weight
4.3 / 5
4.6 / 5▲
Founded20052010
HeadquartersSydney, AustraliaMelbourne, Australia
Min deposit$100No minimum
Spreads from0 pips0 pips
Commission / lot$6/lot$7/lot
Max leverage500:1500:1
Withdrawal feeFreeFree
Regulators
ASIC
CySEC
FCA
ASIC
CySEC
DFSA
BaFin
FMA
Platforms
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
cTrader
TradingView
IRESS
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
cTrader
TradingView
IRESS
Active bonuses
Visit brokerVisit FP Markets Visit Pepperstone

FP Markets vs Pepperstone Forex Broker Pros & Cons

FP MarketsFP Markets
PepperstonePepperstone

Pros

True ECN pricing from 0.0 pips + $6 round-turn commission

Supports MT4, MT5, and cTrader - all three major platforms

IRESS platform for direct-access share CFD trading

Strong ASIC and CySEC regulation

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Negative balance protection

Investor compensation scheme coverage

Raw spread account available

No deposit fees

No inactivity fee

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Advanced charting tools included

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Multilingual customer support

Pros

FCA, ASIC, BaFin, CySEC, DFSA licensed

Razor account: tight spreads + transparent commission

TradingView + MT4 / MT5 / cTrader

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Negative balance protection

Investor compensation scheme coverage

No deposit fees

No inactivity fee

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Advanced charting tools included

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Multilingual customer support

Cons

IRESS platform has a monthly fee for lower-volume traders

Customer support primarily oriented toward Australian trading hours

Not available to US residents

No proprietary platform

Cons

Not available to US residents

No proprietary platform

FP Markets vs Pepperstone: Detailed Category Breakdown

A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.

Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
CriteriaFP MarketsPepperstone
Trust & Regulation
Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.)
Pass
Pass
Segregated client funds
Pass
Pass
Negative balance protection
Pass
Pass
Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS)
Pass
Pass
Fees & Spreads
Raw/ECN spreads available
Pass
Pass
No deposit fee
Pass
Pass
No inactivity fee
Pass
Pass
Transparent pricing page
Pass
Pass
Platforms & Tools
MT4/MT5 available
Pass
Pass
Proprietary platform
Fail
Fail
Mobile app
Pass
Pass
Advanced charting tools
Pass
Pass
Customer Support
24/5 live chat
Pass
Pass
Phone support
Pass
Pass
Multilingual support
Pass
Pass

FP Markets vs Pepperstone: Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our independent editorial scoring, Pepperstone ranks higher with a score of 4.7/5 vs 4.5/5 for FP Markets. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; FP Markets and Pepperstone may each suit different trader profiles.

Both FP Markets and Pepperstone offer spreads starting from 0 pips, making them equivalent on this metric. Consider commissions and account types when evaluating total trading costs.

Pepperstone has a lower minimum deposit of no minimum required, while FP Markets requires at least $100. This makes Pepperstone more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.

Both FP Markets and Pepperstone hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Both are considered safe. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.

For beginners: Pepperstone has a lower minimum deposit (no minimum), lowering the barrier to entry; both brokers offer negative balance protection. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.

FP Markets offers maximum leverage of 500:1, while Pepperstone offers up to 500:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.

FP Markets charges $6 per lot, lower than Pepperstone's $7 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.

FP Markets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView, IRESS and Pepperstone offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView, IRESS; both support MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView, IRESS.

Ready to get started?

Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.

FP Markets

FP Markets

Score 4.5 / 5

Visit FP Markets
Editor's Pick
Pepperstone

Pepperstone

Score 4.7 / 5

Visit Pepperstone

More Broker Comparisons

More FP Markets comparisons

IC Markets

FP MarketsvsIC Markets

CMC Markets

FP MarketsvsCMC Markets

OANDA

FP MarketsvsOANDA

BlackBull Markets

FP MarketsvsBlackBull Markets

IG

FP MarketsvsIG

Fusion Markets

FP MarketsvsFusion Markets

FXOpen

FP MarketsvsFXOpen

ThinkMarkets

FP MarketsvsThinkMarkets

HFM

FP MarketsvsHFM

Exness

FP MarketsvsExness

More Pepperstone comparisons

IC Markets

PepperstonevsIC Markets

FXOpen

PepperstonevsFXOpen

GO Markets

PepperstonevsGO Markets

Blueberry Markets

PepperstonevsBlueberry Markets

TMGM

PepperstonevsTMGM

Admirals

PepperstonevsAdmirals

ACY Securities

PepperstonevsACY Securities

FxPro

PepperstonevsFxPro

Tickmill

PepperstonevsTickmill

Global Prime

PepperstonevsGlobal Prime

Personalised recommendation

Not sure which broker is right for you?

Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.

Find my broker