A head-to-head comparison of HFM and Saxo Bank across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.
No minimum deposit required, high leverage on offshore entity, and copy trading via HFcopy - with FCA, CySEC, and FSCA regulation.
Danish-licensed bank with the deepest multi-asset coverage we cover, premium SaxoTraderGO/PRO platforms, and tiered pricing for active traders.
Saxo Bank comes out ahead with an editorial score of 4.7/5 compared to HFM's 4.1/5.
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
HFM offers tighter spreads from 0 pips vs 0.6 pips for Saxo Bank, reducing trading costs.
Both brokers show an equally strong safety profile across regulation, fund protection, and client safeguards.
HFM has a cost edge: raw/ECN spreads, tighter spreads from 0 pips.
Saxo Bank offers more exclusive platform options: Proprietary Web/Mobile, SaxoTraderGO, a proprietary platform.
Saxo Bank edges out HFM with a higher editorial score (4.7/5 vs 4.1/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.
| Editorial score | 4.1/ 5 | 4.7/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.1 / 5 | 4.9 / 5▲ |
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.1 / 5 | 4.4 / 5▲ |
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 4.0 / 5 | 4.8 / 5▲ |
Customer Support 10% weight | 4.0 / 5 | 4.6 / 5▲ |
| Founded | 2010 | 1992 |
| Headquarters | Limassol, Cyprus | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| Min deposit | No minimum | No minimum |
| Spreads from | 0 pips | 0.6 pips |
| Commission / lot | $6/lot | N/A |
| Max leverage | 2000:1 | 30:1 |
| Withdrawal fee | Free | Free |
| Regulators | FCA FSCA CySEC DFSA | FCA ASIC JFSA MAS SFC DFSA ACPR CNMV FINMA Finansinspektionen Finanstilsynet CMA FSC CBI KNF Finanstilsynet MFSA |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 | Proprietary Web/Mobile SaxoTraderGO |
| Active bonuses | ||
| Visit broker | Visit HFM | Visit Saxo Bank |
Pros
No minimum deposit required to open an account
Copy trading via HFcopy platform
FCA, CySEC, and FSCA regulation
High leverage up to 2000:1 on offshore entity
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
Investor compensation scheme coverage
Raw spread account available
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Pros
Licensed bank (Denmark)
Best-in-class multi-asset platform
Tiered active-trader pricing
Regulated by top-tier authorities (FCA, ASIC, CySEC)
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
Investor compensation scheme coverage
No deposit fees
Mobile trading app available
Proprietary trading platform available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Cons
2000:1 leverage is extremely risky for inexperienced traders
No cTrader support
Zero account commission of $6/lot is above some ECN peers
No proprietary platform
Cons
Higher minimums on classic accounts than ECN brokers
No MT4 / MT5
No raw spread account option
Inactivity fee applies
No MetaTrader support
No 24/5 live chat
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | HFM | Saxo Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Pass | Pass |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Fail |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Fail |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
Based on our independent editorial scoring, Saxo Bank ranks higher with a score of 4.7/5 vs 4.1/5 for HFM. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; HFM and Saxo Bank may each suit different trader profiles.
HFM offers tighter spreads starting from 0 pips, compared to Saxo Bank's spreads from 0.6 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, particularly valuable for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
Neither HFM nor Saxo Bank requires a minimum deposit, making both accessible regardless of starting capital.
Both HFM and Saxo Bank hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Both are considered safe. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners: both brokers offer negative balance protection. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.
HFM offers maximum leverage of 2000:1, while Saxo Bank offers up to 30:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.
HFM charges $6 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for the other broker are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.
HFM supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and Saxo Bank offers Proprietary Web/Mobile, SaxoTraderGO; HFM exclusively offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5; Saxo Bank exclusively offers Proprietary Web/Mobile, SaxoTraderGO.
Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.
Personalised recommendation
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker