FBSvs
TickmillCrypto Exchange Comparison
Two CFD brokers vie for crypto traders on regulation, fees, and platform reach. The tension centers on oversight, compensation schemes, and pricing clarity.
Our Verdict
Tickmill winsby 0.5 pts
Tickmill edges out FBS on the editorial score due to stronger regulation, compensation coverage, and transparent pricing.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1Tickmill offers compensation schemes; FBS does not.
- 2Tickmill provides transparent pricing; FBS does not.
- 3FBS offers a proprietary platform; Tickmill uses MT4/MT5.
Who should choose FBS vs Tickmill?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose FBS if…
Choose FBS if you want a $1 minimum deposit to start trading quickly. You can access MT4 and MT5 with automated crypto trading support for faster execution. You also benefit from 24/7 multilingual chat support that helps you trade in Asian markets.
Choose Tickmill if…
Choose Tickmill if you prioritise regulated trading with FCA, CySEC, and FSCA oversight. You also benefit from one of the lowest ECN commissions in the market, at around $2 per lot round-turn. You gain transparent pricing, and MT4/MT5 with automated trading options to run strategies.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
Recommended
Tickmill provides stronger security with FCA/CySEC/FSCA oversight and compensation schemes.
Best for low fees
FBS vs Tickmill: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  FBS |  Tickmill |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.4/ 5 | 3.9/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | $1▼ lower | $100 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Taker Fee | 20.00% | 6.00%▼ lower |
FBS vs Tickmill Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- $1 minimum deposit, widest accessibility in the industry
- MT4/MT5 with automated crypto trading support
- 24/7 multilingual support popular in Asian markets
Cons
- Offshore regulation (IFSC Belize) for most clients, minimal investor protection
- 3000:1 leverage creates extremely high-risk trading environment
FBS vs Tickmill: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
1
FBS
criteria win
2
Tickmill
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | FBS | Tickmill |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
FBS vs Tickmill: Frequently Asked Questions
Tickmill rates 3.9/5 versus 3.4/5 for FBS. Tickmill edges ahead on our composite score, though both exchanges meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
Both FBS and Tickmill list the same spread figure of 0. Compare each exchange's full fee schedule, including maker/taker rates and any volume discounts, to evaluate total trading costs.
FBS has $1, while Tickmill requires at least $100. This makes FBS more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
Tickmill holds top-tier regulation (FCA, FSCA, CySEC), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, two factors stand out: FBS requires a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry, and Tickmill provides negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
FBS offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus Tickmill's 2:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
Tickmill charges $6 per trade, lower than FBS's $20 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
FBS supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Tickmill supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4.
