FBSvs
SkillingCrypto Exchange Comparison
This comparison pits FBS and Skilling as CFD crypto brokers, highlighting regulator strength, coin coverage, and cost structures.
Our Verdict
Skilling winsby 0.3 pts
Skilling leads FBS on regulation and investor protection, supported by CySEC regulation and a compensation scheme, and achieves the higher editorial score than FBS.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1Live chat 24/5 available on FBS, not Skilling.
- 2Phone support is available on FBS but not Skilling.
- 3FBS lists 6 coins versus Skilling 40+ coins.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
Recommended
Skilling wins with CySEC regulation and investor compensation.
Best for low fees
Recommended
Skilling has no inactivity fee.
FBS vs Skilling: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  FBS |  Skilling |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.4/ 5 | 3.7/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | $1▼ lower | $50 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips▼ lower | 0.7 pips |
| Taker Fee | 20.00% | N/A |
FBS vs Skilling Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- $1 minimum deposit, widest accessibility in the industry
- MT4/MT5 with automated crypto trading support
- 24/7 multilingual support popular in Asian markets
Cons
- Offshore regulation (IFSC Belize) for most clients, minimal investor protection
- 3000:1 leverage creates extremely high-risk trading environment
FBS vs Skilling: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
2
FBS
criteria wins
2
Skilling
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | FBS | Skilling |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Fail |
FBS vs Skilling: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: FBS rates 3.4/5 and Skilling rates 3.7/5. Skilling has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
FBS lists a lower spread from 0, compared with Skilling's 0.7. Crypto trading costs are typically quoted as a percentage of the trade value; check each exchange's full fee schedule, as maker/taker rates and volume discounts vary.
FBS has $1, while Skilling requires at least $50. This makes FBS more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
Skilling holds top-tier regulation (FCA, FSCA, CySEC), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, two factors stand out: FBS requires a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry, and Skilling provides negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
FBS offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus Skilling's 2:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
FBS charges $20 per trade on commission-based accounts. Commission details for Skilling are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
FBS supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Skilling supports cTrader, Skilling Trader, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 4. FBS has exclusive access to MetaTrader 5. Skilling has exclusive access to cTrader and Skilling Trader.
Skilling scores better on fee criteria (no deposit fee, no inactivity fee). Always check both exchanges' current fee schedules, as maker/taker rates and withdrawal fees vary and are subject to change.
