FBSvs
Windsor BrokersCrypto Exchange Comparison
FBS and Windsor Brokers face off in a crypto CFD comparison, highlighting regulation, compensation coverage, and platform choices.
Our Verdict
Windsor Brokers winsby 0.1 pts
FBS and Windsor Brokers are closely matched overall, but Windsor's compensation scheme under CySEC stands out.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1Proprietary platform: FBS uses a proprietary platform, Windsor does not.
- 2Compensation scheme: Windsor provides ICF compensation up to EUR 20,000; FBS does not.
- 3Top-tier regulator: Windsor has CySEC oversight; FBS does not have top-tier status.
Who should choose FBS vs Windsor Brokers?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose FBS if…
Choose FBS if you want a $1 minimum deposit and access to MT4/MT5 with crypto trading features.
Choose Windsor Brokers if…
Choose Windsor Brokers if you prioritize CySEC regulation and ICF compensation coverage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
Recommended
Windsor Brokers wins for security, due to CySEC oversight and ICF compensation coverage.
Best for low fees
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
Windsor Brokers wins for low fees with zero commission on Prime accounts.
FBS vs Windsor Brokers: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  FBS |  Windsor Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.4/ 5 | 3.5/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | $1▼ lower | $100 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Taker Fee | 20.00% | 8.00%▼ lower |
FBS vs Windsor Brokers Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- $1 minimum deposit, widest accessibility in the industry
- MT4/MT5 with automated crypto trading support
- 24/7 multilingual support popular in Asian markets
Cons
- Offshore regulation (IFSC Belize) for most clients, minimal investor protection
- 3000:1 leverage creates extremely high-risk trading environment
FBS vs Windsor Brokers: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
1
FBS
criteria win
2
Windsor Brokers
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | FBS | Windsor Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
FBS vs Windsor Brokers: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: FBS rates 3.4/5 and Windsor Brokers rates 3.5/5. Windsor Brokers has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
Both FBS and Windsor Brokers list the same spread figure of 0. Compare each exchange's full fee schedule, including maker/taker rates and any volume discounts, to evaluate total trading costs.
FBS has $1, while Windsor Brokers requires at least $100. This makes FBS more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
Windsor Brokers holds top-tier regulation (CySEC, FSCA), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, two factors stand out: FBS requires a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry, and Windsor Brokers provides negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
FBS offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus Windsor Brokers's 2:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
Windsor Brokers charges $8 per trade, lower than FBS's $20 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
FBS supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Windsor Brokers supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4.
