FBS vs IC Markets Crypto Exchange Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of FBS and IC Markets across security, fees, coin selection, staking, and editorial scoring.
Score 3.4 / 5
FBS offers crypto CFDs with extremely high leverage and a near-zero minimum deposit - a popular choice across Asia and the CIS region, though regulated primarily in an offshore jurisdiction.
VS
Score 4.1 / 5
IC Markets offers crypto CFDs on 20+ pairs via MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView with ECN-adjacent execution and ASIC/CySEC regulation - a competitive regulated route to digital asset CFD exposure for active traders.
Our Verdict
IC Markets winsClear Winner
IC Markets comes out ahead with an editorial score of 4.1/5 compared to FBS's 3.4/5.
IC Markets
4.1/5
FBS
3.4/5
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
Recommended
IC Markets scores higher on security: top-tier regulation, segregated funds.
Best for low fees
Recommended
IC Markets has a lower fee profile: no deposit fee, no inactivity fee.
Best for beginners
Recommended
IC Markets edges out FBS with a higher editorial score (4.1/5 vs 3.4/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new crypto traders.
Best for coin selection
Insufficient data
Data not yet available
Coin-selection data is not yet available for this pair. Check each exchange's supported assets page to compare the number of tradeable cryptocurrencies.
Best for DeFi & Web3
Insufficient data
Data not yet available
DeFi and NFT feature data is not yet available for this pair. Check each exchange's Web3 product pages directly.
FBS vs IC Markets: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  FBS |  IC Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial Score | 3.4/ 5 | 4.1/ 5 |
| Min. Deposit | $1 | $200 |
| Regulators | CySEC IFSC FSCA | ASIC CySEC FSCA |
| Cold Storage | No | No |
| Proof of Reserves | No | No |
| Staking | No | No |
| DeFi Integration | No | No |
| NFT Trading | No | No |
| 500+ Coins | No | No |
| P2P Trading | No | No |
| Crypto Earn / Savings | No | No |
| Token Launchpad | No | No |
| Visit exchange | Visit FBS | Visit IC Markets |
FBS vs IC Markets Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- $1 minimum deposit - widest accessibility in the industry
- MT4/MT5 with automated crypto trading support
- 24/7 multilingual support popular in Asian markets
Cons
- Offshore regulation (IFSC Belize) for most clients - minimal investor protection
- 3000:1 leverage creates extremely high-risk trading environment
- Limited crypto pairs vs dedicated crypto platforms
Pros
- ECN-adjacent raw spreads on crypto CFDs - tighter than most retail market makers
- All four platforms (MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView) support crypto CFDs from one account
- ASIC and CySEC regulated with segregated client funds and negative balance protection
- No inactivity fee; 24/7 customer support across multiple channels
Cons
- CFDs only - no real crypto ownership, staking, or on-chain withdrawals
- Narrower coin selection (20+) than dedicated exchanges offering hundreds of tokens
- No DeFi access or NFT trading
- Not available to US residents
FBS vs IC Markets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
0
FBS
criteria wins
3
IC Markets
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | FBS | IC Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
FBS vs IC Markets: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, IC Markets ranks higher with a score of 4.1/5 vs 3.4/5 for FBS. The best choice still depends on your individual needs — security, coin selection, fees, and staking offerings all matter.
IC Markets scores higher on our security criteria. When evaluating exchange safety, look for cold storage, proof of reserves, regulatory oversight, and segregated client funds. Always verify the current security posture directly with the exchange.
IC Markets has a lower fee profile, with no deposit fee and no inactivity fee. Always check each platform's trading fee schedule directly, as crypto exchange fees vary by asset, trading volume, and account tier.
Neither FBS nor IC Markets is listed as offering staking in our data. Check each exchange's website directly for the most up-to-date staking offerings, as this feature changes frequently.
FBS has a lower minimum deposit of $1, while IC Markets requires at least $200. This makes FBS more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
For beginners: FBS has a lower minimum deposit ($1); IC Markets has a higher overall editorial score. Also consider each exchange's educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of their user interface before deciding.
More Crypto Exchange Comparisons
More FBS comparisons
More IC Markets comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker