IC Markets vs RoboForex Crypto Exchange Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of IC Markets and RoboForex across security, fees, coin selection, staking, and editorial scoring.
Score 4.1 / 5
IC Markets offers crypto CFDs on 20+ pairs via MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView with ECN-adjacent execution and ASIC/CySEC regulation - a competitive regulated route to digital asset CFD exposure for active traders.
VS
Score 3.6 / 5
RoboForex offers crypto CFDs with very low minimum deposit and a broad platform ecosystem - an FSC-regulated multi-asset broker with one of the widest product ranges in the offshore segment.
Our Verdict
IC Markets winsby 0.5 pts
IC Markets edges ahead with a score of 4.1/5 vs RoboForex's 3.6/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
Recommended
IC Markets scores higher on security: top-tier regulation, segregated funds.
Best for low fees
Recommended
IC Markets has a lower fee profile: no deposit fee, no inactivity fee.
Best for beginners
Recommended
IC Markets edges out RoboForex with a higher editorial score (4.1/5 vs 3.6/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new crypto traders.
Best for coin selection
Insufficient data
Data not yet available
Coin-selection data is not yet available for this pair. Check each exchange's supported assets page to compare the number of tradeable cryptocurrencies.
Best for DeFi & Web3
Insufficient data
Data not yet available
DeFi and NFT feature data is not yet available for this pair. Check each exchange's Web3 product pages directly.
IC Markets vs RoboForex: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  IC Markets |  RoboForex |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial Score | 4.1/ 5 | 3.6/ 5 |
| Min. Deposit | $200 | $10 |
| Regulators | ASIC CySEC FSCA | CySEC IFSC FSCA |
| Cold Storage | No | No |
| Proof of Reserves | No | No |
| Staking | No | No |
| DeFi Integration | No | No |
| NFT Trading | No | No |
| 500+ Coins | No | No |
| P2P Trading | No | No |
| Crypto Earn / Savings | No | No |
| Token Launchpad | No | No |
| Visit exchange | Visit IC Markets | Visit RoboForex |
IC Markets vs RoboForex Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- ECN-adjacent raw spreads on crypto CFDs - tighter than most retail market makers
- All four platforms (MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView) support crypto CFDs from one account
- ASIC and CySEC regulated with segregated client funds and negative balance protection
- No inactivity fee; 24/7 customer support across multiple channels
Cons
- CFDs only - no real crypto ownership, staking, or on-chain withdrawals
- Narrower coin selection (20+) than dedicated exchanges offering hundreds of tokens
- No DeFi access or NFT trading
- Not available to US residents
Pros
- Wide crypto selection including 10+ CFD pairs on MT5
- R Trader proprietary platform with professional-grade charting
- $10 minimum deposit with multiple account types
Cons
- FSC (Belize) offshore regulation - limited investor protection
- Very high maximum leverage (2000:1) amplifies risk significantly
- No compensation scheme for most clients
IC Markets vs RoboForex: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
2
IC Markets
criteria wins
0
RoboForex
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | IC Markets | RoboForex |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
IC Markets vs RoboForex: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, IC Markets ranks higher with a score of 4.1/5 vs 3.6/5 for RoboForex. The best choice still depends on your individual needs — security, coin selection, fees, and staking offerings all matter.
IC Markets scores higher on our security criteria. When evaluating exchange safety, look for cold storage, proof of reserves, regulatory oversight, and segregated client funds. Always verify the current security posture directly with the exchange.
IC Markets has a lower fee profile, with no deposit fee and no inactivity fee. Always check each platform's trading fee schedule directly, as crypto exchange fees vary by asset, trading volume, and account tier.
Neither IC Markets nor RoboForex is listed as offering staking in our data. Check each exchange's website directly for the most up-to-date staking offerings, as this feature changes frequently.
RoboForex has a lower minimum deposit of $10, while IC Markets requires at least $200. This makes RoboForex more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
For beginners: RoboForex has a lower minimum deposit ($10); IC Markets has a higher overall editorial score. Also consider each exchange's educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of their user interface before deciding.
More Crypto Exchange Comparisons
More IC Markets comparisons
More RoboForex comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker