FP Marketsvs
RoboForexCrypto Exchange Comparison
In this head to head, FP Markets and RoboForex compete on regulation and platform breadth for crypto CFDs. The differences touch safety, coin coverage, and flexibility.
Our Verdict
FP Markets winsby 0.4 pts
FP Markets edges RoboForex on the editorial score. It is supported by stronger regulation and a compensation scheme.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1FP Markets has compensation scheme and negative balance protection; RoboForex lacks both.
- 2RoboForex offers the R Trader proprietary platform in addition to MT4/MT5.
- 3FP Markets is regulated by ASIC and CySEC; RoboForex holds offshore FSC Belize.
Who should choose FP Markets vs RoboForex?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose FP Markets if…
Choose FP Markets if you want regulated crypto CFDs with a compensation scheme and segregated client funds.
Choose RoboForex if…
Choose RoboForex if you want a broad platform range including R Trader and a low $10 minimum deposit.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
Recommended
FP Markets wins for security due to ASIC and CySEC oversight and segregated client funds.
Best for low fees
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
FP Markets is best for low fees with no crypto commissions and spreads only.
FP Markets vs RoboForex: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  FP Markets |  RoboForex |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 4.0/ 5 | 3.6/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | $100 | $10▼ lower |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Taker Fee | 6.00%▼ lower | 20.00% |
FP Markets vs RoboForex Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- Crypto CFDs available on MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView, no platform switching
- ASIC and CySEC regulation with segregated client funds
- Integrates into existing multi-asset account alongside forex, indices, and shares
- No commission on crypto CFDs; spread-only pricing
Cons
- CFDs only, no real crypto ownership, staking, or on-chain access
FP Markets vs RoboForex: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
2
FP Markets
criteria wins
0
RoboForex
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | FP Markets | RoboForex |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
FP Markets vs RoboForex: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: FP Markets rates 4/5 and RoboForex rates 3.6/5. FP Markets has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
Both FP Markets and RoboForex list the same spread figure of 0. Compare each exchange's full fee schedule, including maker/taker rates and any volume discounts, to evaluate total trading costs.
RoboForex has $10, while FP Markets requires at least $100. This makes RoboForex more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
FP Markets holds top-tier regulation (ASIC, CySEC), providing stronger investor protections. RoboForex may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, two factors stand out: RoboForex requires a lower minimum deposit ($10), lowering the barrier to entry, and FP Markets provides negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
FP Markets offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus RoboForex's 2:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
FP Markets charges $6 per trade, lower than RoboForex's $20 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
FP Markets supports cTrader, IRESS, MetaTrader 5, TradingView, MetaTrader 4, while RoboForex supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, MetaTrader 4. Both provide cTrader and MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. FP Markets has exclusive access to IRESS and TradingView. RoboForex has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile.
FP Markets scores better on fee criteria (no deposit fee, no inactivity fee). Always check both exchanges' current fee schedules, as maker/taker rates and withdrawal fees vary and are subject to change.
