AvaTradevs
FBSCrypto Exchange Comparison
Two CFD crypto brokers compete on regulation breadth and asset depth. The tension hinges on coin coverage and regulatory scope, previewing a verdict that weighs safety against access.
Our Verdict
AvaTrade winsby 0.5 pts
AvaTrade edges FBS on the editorial score, making it the overall winner in this comparison. It lists 20 crypto CFDs and is regulated by multiple authorities, while FBS offers six coins under CySEC/IFSC/FSCA.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1Coin count difference: AvaTrade lists 20 coins, FBS lists 6.
- 2Regulators: AvaTrade regulated by multiple authorities; FBS by CySEC/IFSC/FSCA.
- 3Negative balance protection: AvaTrade yes, FBS no.
Who should choose AvaTrade vs FBS?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
Recommended
AvaTrade wins for security due to multiple regulators and oversight.
Best for low fees
Recommended
AvaTrade offers fixed spreads providing cost certainty.
AvaTrade vs FBS: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  AvaTrade |  FBS |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.9/ 5 | 3.4/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | $100 | $1▼ lower |
| Spreads From | 0.9 pips | 0 pips▼ lower |
| Taker Fee | N/A | 20.00% |
AvaTrade vs FBS Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- Fixed spread pricing on crypto CFDs, cost certainty for systematic strategies
- Available across MT4, MT5, AvaTradeGO, and DupliTrade copy-trading
- Multi-jurisdictional regulation including CBI (EU), ASIC, and FSA (Japan)
- 24/5 multilingual customer support with dedicated account managers
Cons
- CFDs only, no real crypto ownership, staking, or on-chain access
AvaTrade vs FBS: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
1
AvaTrade
criteria win
0
FBS
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | AvaTrade | FBS |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
AvaTrade vs FBS: Frequently Asked Questions
AvaTrade rates 3.9/5 versus 3.4/5 for FBS. AvaTrade edges ahead on our composite score, though both exchanges meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
FBS lists a lower spread from 0, compared with AvaTrade's 0.9. Crypto trading costs are typically quoted as a percentage of the trade value; check each exchange's full fee schedule, as maker/taker rates and volume discounts vary.
FBS has $1, while AvaTrade requires at least $100. This makes FBS more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
AvaTrade holds top-tier regulation (FSCA, ASIC, MFSA), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, two factors stand out: FBS requires a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry, and AvaTrade provides negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
AvaTrade offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus FBS's 2:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
FBS charges $20 per trade on commission-based accounts. Commission details for AvaTrade are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
AvaTrade supports ZuluTrade, MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, MetaTrader 4, while FBS supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. AvaTrade has exclusive access to ZuluTrade and Proprietary Web/Mobile.
