FBSvs
Forex.comCrypto Exchange Comparison
This matchup pits FBS and Forex.com as CFD crypto brokers with differing risk and regulation profiles. The tension centers on security, protections, and regulatory oversight.
Our Verdict
Forex.com winsby 0.5 pts
Forex.com edges out FBS on the editorial score thanks to top-tier regulation, a compensation scheme, and negative balance protection.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1FBS has no deposit fee; Forex.com charges one.
- 2Forex.com offers a compensation scheme.
- 3Forex.com provides negative balance protection; FBS does not.
Who should choose FBS vs Forex.com?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
Recommended
Forex.com wins for security due to top-tier regulators and negative balance protection.
Best for low fees
Recommended
FBS vs Forex.com: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  FBS |  Forex.com |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.4/ 5 | 3.9/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | $1▼ lower | $100 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips▼ lower | 1 pips |
| Taker Fee | 20.00% | 7.00%▼ lower |
FBS vs Forex.com Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- $1 minimum deposit, widest accessibility in the industry
- MT4/MT5 with automated crypto trading support
- 24/7 multilingual support popular in Asian markets
Cons
- Offshore regulation (IFSC Belize) for most clients, minimal investor protection
- 3000:1 leverage creates extremely high-risk trading environment
FBS vs Forex.com: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
1
FBS
criteria win
2
Forex.com
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | FBS | Forex.com |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Fail |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
FBS vs Forex.com: Frequently Asked Questions
Forex.com rates 3.9/5 versus 3.4/5 for FBS. Forex.com edges ahead on our composite score, though both exchanges meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
FBS lists a lower spread from 0, compared with Forex.com's 1. Crypto trading costs are typically quoted as a percentage of the trade value; check each exchange's full fee schedule, as maker/taker rates and volume discounts vary.
FBS has $1, while Forex.com requires at least $100. This makes FBS more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
Forex.com holds top-tier regulation (MAS, IIROC, FCA), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, two factors stand out: FBS requires a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry, and Forex.com provides negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
FBS offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus Forex.com's 50:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
Forex.com charges $7 per trade, lower than FBS's $20 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
FBS supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Forex.com supports MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. Forex.com has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile.
FBS scores better on fee criteria (no deposit fee). Always check both exchanges' current fee schedules, as maker/taker rates and withdrawal fees vary and are subject to change.
