Capital.comvs
FBSCrypto Exchange Comparison
This comparison contrasts Capital.com's AI-powered crypto CFDs with FBS's MT4/MT5 trading platform. The debate centers on regulation, asset depth, and fee structures.
Our Verdict
Capital.com winsClear Winner
Capital.com outperforms FBS on editorial score and regulatory standing, making Capital.com the overall winner.
Capital.com
4.0/5
FBS
3.4/5
Key Differences
- 1Capital.com lists 200 crypto CFDs, FBS lists 6 coins.
- 2Capital.com offers compensation scheme and negative balance protection; FBS lacks both.
- 3Capital.com has no inactivity fee; FBS does not advertise such a policy.
Who should choose Capital.com vs FBS?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose Capital.com if…
Choose Capital.com if you want a regulated crypto CFD offer with strong protections, no inactivity fees, and access to AI trading insights that help identify patterns and biases. You also get access to 200 crypto CFDs and a platform that integrates AI features into decision-making.
Choose FBS if…
Choose FBS if you want a very low barrier to entry with a $1 minimum deposit and the option to trade crypto on MT4/MT5 with automated tools. You also benefit from 24/7 multilingual support and broader regional access, though the platform relies on offshore regulation.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
Recommended
Capital.com wins for security, backed by cross-border, top-tier regulators and investor protections like compensation and negative balance.
Best for low fees
Recommended
Capital.com vs FBS: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  Capital.com |  FBS |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 4.0/ 5 | 3.4/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | $20 | $1▼ lower |
| Spreads From | 0.6 pips | 0 pips▼ lower |
| Taker Fee | N/A | 20.00% |
Capital.com vs FBS Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- 200+ crypto CFDs, widest regulated crypto CFD selection among multi-asset brokers
- AI-powered trading insights identify behavioural biases and risk patterns
- FCA, ASIC, and CySEC regulated with no minimum deposit and no inactivity fee
- No commission on any CFD instrument including all crypto pairs
Cons
- CFDs only, no real crypto ownership, staking, or on-chain access
Capital.com vs FBS: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
2
Capital.com
criteria wins
1
FBS
criteria win
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | Capital.com | FBS |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Fail | Pass |
Capital.com vs FBS: Frequently Asked Questions
Capital.com rates 4/5 versus 3.4/5 for FBS. Capital.com edges ahead on our composite score, though both exchanges meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
FBS lists a lower spread from 0, compared with Capital.com's 0.6. Crypto trading costs are typically quoted as a percentage of the trade value; check each exchange's full fee schedule, as maker/taker rates and volume discounts vary.
FBS has $1, while Capital.com requires at least $20. This makes FBS more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
Capital.com holds top-tier regulation (MAS, FCA, ASIC), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, two factors stand out: FBS requires a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry, and Capital.com provides negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
Capital.com offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus FBS's 2:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
FBS charges $20 per trade on commission-based accounts. Commission details for Capital.com are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
Capital.com supports Proprietary Web/Mobile, while FBS supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Capital.com has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile. FBS has exclusive access to MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4.
Capital.com scores better on fee criteria (no deposit fee, no inactivity fee). Always check both exchanges' current fee schedules, as maker/taker rates and withdrawal fees vary and are subject to change.
