ATFXvs
FBSCrypto Exchange Comparison
In this crypto CFD showdown, ATFX and FBS compete on regulation, leverage, and asset scope, testing whether safety or accessibility dominates for crypto exposure.
Our Verdict
ATFX winsby 0.2 pts
ATFX edges FBS on editorial score, backed by top-tier regulation and compensation schemes. FBS remains higher risk due to offshore oversight and very high leverage.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1ATFX is regulated by FCA/CySEC/FSCA; FBS is offshore IFSC Belize.
- 2ATFX offers a $0 minimum deposit; FBS requires $1.
- 3FBS provides MT4/MT5 with a proprietary platform; ATFX uses MT4 only.
Who should choose ATFX vs FBS?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose ATFX if…
Choose ATFX if you prioritize strong regulation from FCA, CySEC, and FSCA.
Choose FBS if…
Choose ATFX if you value a $0 minimum deposit and negative balance protection. Choose FBS if you want very low entry barriers with a $1 minimum deposit. Choose FBS if you need MT4 and MT5 with automated crypto trading and 24/7 multilingual support.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
Recommended
ATFX wins security due to FCA/CySEC/FSCA oversight and protections.
Best for low fees
Recommended
ATFX vs FBS: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  ATFX |  FBS |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.6/ 5 | 3.4/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | No minimum▼ lower | $1 |
| Spreads From | 1.8 pips | 0 pips▼ lower |
| Taker Fee | N/A | 20.00% |
ATFX vs FBS Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- FCA, CySEC, and FSCA regulation, UK clients get FSCS protection up to GBP 85,000
- Crypto CFDs available on MT4 alongside forex, indices, and equities, no platform switching
- No minimum deposit or inactivity fee
- Negative balance protection under FCA and CySEC frameworks
Cons
- MT4 only, no MT5, cTrader, or proprietary platform for crypto
ATFX vs FBS: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
3
ATFX
criteria wins
0
FBS
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | ATFX | FBS |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
ATFX vs FBS: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: ATFX rates 3.6/5 and FBS rates 3.4/5. ATFX has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
FBS lists a lower spread from 0, compared with ATFX's 1.8. Crypto trading costs are typically quoted as a percentage of the trade value; check each exchange's full fee schedule, as maker/taker rates and volume discounts vary.
ATFX has no minimum deposit, while FBS requires at least $1. This makes ATFX more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
ATFX holds top-tier regulation (FCA, FSCA, CySEC), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
ATFX stands out for beginners: it has a lower entry point and provides negative balance protection, which caps losses at your deposited amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
ATFX offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus FBS's 2:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
FBS charges $20 per trade on commission-based accounts. Commission details for ATFX are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
ATFX supports MetaTrader 4, while FBS supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 4. FBS has exclusive access to MetaTrader 5.
ATFX scores better on fee criteria (no deposit fee, no inactivity fee). Always check both exchanges' current fee schedules, as maker/taker rates and withdrawal fees vary and are subject to change.
