NAGA vs Tickmill Crypto Exchange Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of NAGA and Tickmill across security, fees, coin selection, staking, and editorial scoring.
Score 3.8 / 5
NAGA offers crypto CFDs on 100+ pairs via its proprietary platform with integrated Autocopy social trading under FCA and CySEC regulation - one of the widest crypto CFD selections among regulated multi-asset platforms.
VS
Score 3.9 / 5
Tickmill offers crypto CFDs under FCA and CySEC regulation with ECN execution and among the lowest commissions in the regulated space - a strong choice for cost-conscious institutional-style traders.
Our Verdict
Tickmill winsby 0.1 pts
Tickmill edges ahead with a score of 3.9/5 vs NAGA's 3.8/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
It's a tie
Both equally suited
Both exchanges show an equally strong security profile across cold storage, proof of reserves, and regulatory oversight.
Best for low fees
It's a tie
Both equally suited
Both exchanges offer equivalent fee conditions — no deposit fee and no inactivity fee.
Best for beginners
Recommended
Tickmill edges out NAGA with a higher editorial score (3.9/5 vs 3.8/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new crypto traders.
Best for coin selection
Insufficient data
Data not yet available
Coin-selection data is not yet available for this pair. Check each exchange's supported assets page to compare the number of tradeable cryptocurrencies.
Best for DeFi & Web3
Insufficient data
Data not yet available
DeFi and NFT feature data is not yet available for this pair. Check each exchange's Web3 product pages directly.
NAGA vs Tickmill: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  NAGA |  Tickmill |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial Score | 3.8/ 5 | 3.9/ 5 |
| Min. Deposit | No minimum | $100 |
| Regulators | CySEC BaFin FSCA | CySEC FCA FSCA |
| Cold Storage | No | No |
| Proof of Reserves | No | No |
| Staking | No | No |
| DeFi Integration | No | No |
| NFT Trading | No | No |
| 500+ Coins | No | No |
| P2P Trading | No | No |
| Crypto Earn / Savings | No | No |
| Token Launchpad | No | No |
| Visit exchange | Visit NAGA | Visit Tickmill |
NAGA vs Tickmill Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- 100+ crypto CFDs - one of the widest regulated multi-asset crypto selections
- NAGA Autocopy enables social copy trading of crypto strategies with public track records
- CySEC and FCA regulated; Frankfurt Stock Exchange listed
- No minimum deposit on standard accounts
Cons
- CFDs only - no real crypto ownership, staking, or on-chain access
- Inactivity fee applies after just 90 days - shorter than most competitors
- Primary identity as social trading platform means execution depth is not the focus
- Copying crypto Champions creates platform dependency
Pros
- FCA and CySEC regulated - with FSCS and ICF compensation coverage
- Among the lowest ECN commissions available: $2 per lot round-turn
- MT4 with VPSMAX infrastructure for automated crypto strategies
Cons
- Crypto selection is limited to major pairs only
- No proprietary platform or advanced research tools
- Pro accounts (raw spread) require higher minimum deposit
NAGA vs Tickmill: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
0
NAGA
criteria wins
2
Tickmill
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | NAGA | Tickmill |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Fail | Fail |
| Phone support | Fail | Pass |
NAGA vs Tickmill: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, Tickmill ranks higher with a score of 3.9/5 vs 3.8/5 for NAGA. The best choice still depends on your individual needs — security, coin selection, fees, and staking offerings all matter.
NAGA and Tickmill show a similar security profile in our data. Both should be evaluated on cold storage practices, proof of reserves, regulatory oversight, and whether client funds are held separately from operational funds.
NAGA and Tickmill appear similar on fee criteria in our data. Compare each exchange's trading fee schedule directly, as crypto fees vary by asset, volume tier, and payment method.
Neither NAGA nor Tickmill is listed as offering staking in our data. Check each exchange's website directly for the most up-to-date staking offerings, as this feature changes frequently.
NAGA has a lower minimum deposit of no minimum required, while Tickmill requires at least $100. This makes NAGA more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
For beginners: NAGA has a lower minimum deposit (no minimum); Tickmill has a higher overall editorial score. Also consider each exchange's educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of their user interface before deciding.
More Crypto Exchange Comparisons
More NAGA comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker