AMarketsvs
Interactive BrokersCrypto Exchange Comparison
This comparison pits AMarkets, a CFD-focused offshore broker, against Interactive Brokers, a regulated platform that offers real crypto ownership. The axis centers on regulation, asset depth, and pricing transparency.
Our Verdict
Interactive Brokers winsClear Winner
Interactive Brokers outpaces AMarkets on the editorial score, reflecting stronger regulation and more transparent pricing.
Interactive Brokers
4.0/5
AMarkets
3.3/5
Key Differences
- 1IBKR offers real crypto ownership while AMarkets provides CFDs only.
- 2IBKR uses transparent pricing with commissions; AMarkets pricing is not transparent.
- 3IBKR lists nine coins while AMarkets lists eight.
Who should choose AMarkets vs Interactive Brokers?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose AMarkets if…
Choose AMarkets if you want crypto CFDs with MT4/MT5 copy trading and low spreads.
Choose Interactive Brokers if…
Choose Interactive Brokers if you want real crypto ownership on regulated platforms with transparent commissions.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
Recommended
Interactive Brokers wins for security with multi-jurisdiction regulation including SEC, FINRA, and FCA oversight.
Best for low fees
Recommended
AMarkets vs Interactive Brokers: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  AMarkets |  Interactive Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.3/ 5 | 4.0/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | $100 | No minimum▼ lower |
| Spreads From | 0 pips▼ lower | 0.2 pips |
| Taker Fee | 6.00% | 2.00%▼ lower |
AMarkets vs Interactive Brokers Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- Crypto CFDs available with high leverage options
- MT4/MT5 with copy trading integration
- Low spreads on standard and ECN account types
Cons
- Offshore regulation (SVG/FSA), minimal investor protection
- 3000:1 leverage on forex is extremely high-risk
AMarkets vs Interactive Brokers: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
1
AMarkets
criteria win
3
Interactive Brokers
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | Interactive Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs Interactive Brokers: Frequently Asked Questions
Interactive Brokers rates 4/5 versus 3.3/5 for AMarkets. Interactive Brokers edges ahead on our composite score, though both exchanges meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
AMarkets lists a lower spread from 0, compared with Interactive Brokers's 0.2. Crypto trading costs are typically quoted as a percentage of the trade value; check each exchange's full fee schedule, as maker/taker rates and volume discounts vary.
Interactive Brokers has no minimum deposit, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes Interactive Brokers more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
Interactive Brokers holds top-tier regulation (DFSA, FCA, CNB), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
Interactive Brokers stands out for beginners: it has a lower entry point and provides negative balance protection, which caps losses at your deposited amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
AMarkets offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus Interactive Brokers's 1:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
Interactive Brokers charges $2 per trade, lower than AMarkets's $6 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
AMarkets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Interactive Brokers supports Proprietary Web/Mobile. AMarkets has exclusive access to cTrader and MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. Interactive Brokers has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile.
Interactive Brokers scores better on fee criteria (no deposit fee, no inactivity fee). Always check both exchanges' current fee schedules, as maker/taker rates and withdrawal fees vary and are subject to change.
