Blueberry Marketsvs
Interactive BrokersCrypto Exchange Comparison
Blueberry Markets and Interactive Brokers face off on regulation, coin breadth, and platform ecosystems. The debate centers on whether CFDs or direct crypto ownership drives safer, more versatile trading.
Our Verdict
Interactive Brokers winsby 0.4 pts
Interactive Brokers leads on the editorial score, backed by broad regulation and real crypto ownership. Blueberry Markets remains competitive with ASIC oversight and raw ECN crypto CFDs.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1Blueberry offers crypto CFDs; Interactive offers real crypto ownership.
- 2Blueberry lists 5 coins; Interactive lists 9 coins.
- 3Interactive has a proprietary platform; Blueberry lacks one.
Who should choose Blueberry Markets vs Interactive Brokers?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose Blueberry Markets if…
Choose Blueberry Markets if you want ASIC regulation, segregated funds, and ECN crypto CFDs.
Choose Interactive Brokers if…
Choose Interactive Brokers if you want real crypto ownership, broad regulatory oversight, and multi-asset trading.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
Interactive Brokers benefits from broad multi-jurisdictional oversight, strengthening regulatory security beyond a single regulator.
Best for low fees
Recommended
Blueberry Markets vs Interactive Brokers: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  Blueberry Markets |  Interactive Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.6/ 5 | 4.0/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | $100 | No minimum▼ lower |
| Spreads From | 0 pips▼ lower | 0.2 pips |
| Taker Fee | 8.00% | 2.00%▼ lower |
Blueberry Markets vs Interactive Brokers Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- ASIC regulated with segregated client funds and NBP
- Raw ECN spreads on crypto CFDs, low cost for active traders
- MT4/MT5 with full algorithmic trading support
Cons
- Small crypto selection (BTC/ETH focused)
- No proprietary platform or advanced research tools
Blueberry Markets vs Interactive Brokers: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | Blueberry Markets | Interactive Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Fail | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
Blueberry Markets vs Interactive Brokers: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: Blueberry Markets rates 3.6/5 and Interactive Brokers rates 4/5. Interactive Brokers has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
Blueberry Markets lists a lower spread from 0, compared with Interactive Brokers's 0.2. Crypto trading costs are typically quoted as a percentage of the trade value; check each exchange's full fee schedule, as maker/taker rates and volume discounts vary.
Interactive Brokers has no minimum deposit, while Blueberry Markets requires at least $100. This makes Interactive Brokers more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
Both Blueberry Markets and Interactive Brokers hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each exchange's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, two factors stand out: Interactive Brokers has no minimum deposit, removing the capital barrier entirely, and both exchanges provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
Blueberry Markets offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus Interactive Brokers's 1:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
Interactive Brokers charges $2 per trade, lower than Blueberry Markets's $8 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
Blueberry Markets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Interactive Brokers supports Trader Workstation (TWS), Proprietary Web/Mobile. Blueberry Markets has exclusive access to cTrader and MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. Interactive Brokers has exclusive access to Trader Workstation (TWS) and Proprietary Web/Mobile.
