A head-to-head comparison of Blueberry Markets and IG across security, fees, coin selection, staking, and editorial scoring.
Blueberry Markets is an ASIC-regulated Australian ECN broker offering crypto CFDs on major pairs - competitive raw spreads and institutional-style execution for retail traders.
IG comes out ahead with an editorial score of 4.2/5 compared to Blueberry Markets's 3.6/5.
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Both exchanges show an equally strong security profile across cold storage, proof of reserves, and regulatory oversight.
Blueberry Markets has a lower fee profile: no deposit fee, no inactivity fee.
IG edges out Blueberry Markets with a higher editorial score (4.2/5 vs 3.6/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new crypto traders.
Coin-selection data is not yet available for this pair. Check each exchange's supported assets page to compare the number of tradeable cryptocurrencies.
DeFi and NFT feature data is not yet available for this pair. Check each exchange's Web3 product pages directly.
| Criteria | ||
|---|---|---|
| Editorial Score | 3.6/ 5 | 4.2/ 5 |
| Min. Deposit | $100 | No minimum |
| Regulators | ASIC VFSC | ASIC DFSA CMVM Finansinspektionen Finanstilsynet FCA BaFin CBI FMA Finanstilsynet KNF |
| Cold Storage | No | No |
| Proof of Reserves | No | No |
| Staking | No | No |
| DeFi Integration | No | No |
| NFT Trading | No | No |
| 500+ Coins | No | No |
| P2P Trading | No | No |
| Crypto Earn / Savings | No | No |
| Token Launchpad | No | No |
| Visit exchange | Visit Blueberry Markets | Visit IG |
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | Blueberry Markets | IG |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Fail | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
Based on our independent editorial scoring, IG ranks higher with a score of 4.2/5 vs 3.6/5 for Blueberry Markets. The best choice still depends on your individual needs — security, coin selection, fees, and staking offerings all matter.
Blueberry Markets and IG show a similar security profile in our data. Both should be evaluated on cold storage practices, proof of reserves, regulatory oversight, and whether client funds are held separately from operational funds.
Blueberry Markets has a lower fee profile, with no deposit fee and no inactivity fee. Always check each platform's trading fee schedule directly, as crypto exchange fees vary by asset, trading volume, and account tier.
Neither Blueberry Markets nor IG is listed as offering staking in our data. Check each exchange's website directly for the most up-to-date staking offerings, as this feature changes frequently.
IG has a lower minimum deposit of no minimum required, while Blueberry Markets requires at least $100. This makes IG more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
For beginners: IG has a lower minimum deposit (no minimum); IG has a higher overall editorial score. Also consider each exchange's educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of their user interface before deciding.
Personalised recommendation
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker