Admiralsvs
Blueberry MarketsCrypto Exchange Comparison
Both focus on crypto CFDs rather than native coins, but they diverge on regulation breadth, coin depth, and pricing practices. The matchup pits broader oversight against transparent pricing.
Our Verdict
Admirals winsby 0.3 pts
Admirals outperforms Blueberry Markets on editorial score and regulatory breadth, offering 30 crypto CFDs under FCA, CySEC and ASIC, while Blueberry emphasizes transparent pricing.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1Admirals offers 24/5 live chat; Blueberry Markets does not.
- 2Admirals lists 30 coins; Blueberry Markets lists 5.
- 3Admirals provides a compensation scheme; Blueberry Markets does not.
Who should choose Admirals vs Blueberry Markets?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose Admirals if…
Choose Admirals if you want 24/5 live chat support and a 30-coin crypto CFD range, plus a compensation scheme and multilingual support.
Choose Blueberry Markets if…
Choose Blueberry Markets if you prefer transparent pricing and ASIC regulation with segregated client funds.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
Admirals wins Best for security due to broader regulation (FCA, CySEC, ASIC, KNF) than Blueberry Markets.
Best for low fees
Recommended
Admirals vs Blueberry Markets: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  Admirals |  Blueberry Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.9/ 5 | 3.6/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | No minimum▼ lower | $100 |
| Spreads From | 0.5 pips | 0 pips▼ lower |
| Taker Fee | 6.00%▼ lower | 8.00% |
Admirals vs Blueberry Markets Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- 30+ crypto CFDs on MT4 and MT5 under FCA, CySEC, and ASIC regulation
- MetaTrader Supreme Edition plugin adds enhanced charting and sentiment tools
- No minimum deposit; FSCS protection up to GBP 85,000 for UK retail clients
- Broad multi-asset offering, crypto alongside forex, equities, ETFs, and commodities
Cons
- CFDs only, no real crypto ownership, staking, or on-chain access
Admirals vs Blueberry Markets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
1
Admirals
criteria win
1
Blueberry Markets
criteria win
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | Admirals | Blueberry Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
Admirals vs Blueberry Markets: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: Admirals rates 3.9/5 and Blueberry Markets rates 3.6/5. Admirals has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
Blueberry Markets lists a lower spread from 0, compared with Admirals's 0.5. Crypto trading costs are typically quoted as a percentage of the trade value; check each exchange's full fee schedule, as maker/taker rates and volume discounts vary.
Admirals has no minimum deposit, while Blueberry Markets requires at least $100. This makes Admirals more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
Both Admirals and Blueberry Markets hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each exchange's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, two factors stand out: Admirals has no minimum deposit, removing the capital barrier entirely, and both exchanges provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
Admirals offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus Blueberry Markets's 2:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
Admirals charges $6 per trade, lower than Blueberry Markets's $8 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
Admirals supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Blueberry Markets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. Blueberry Markets has exclusive access to cTrader.
