ACY Securitiesvs
Interactive BrokersCrypto Exchange Comparison
ACY Securities and Interactive Brokers face off on crypto exposure, regulation, and platform depth. The matchup contrasts CFDs with real ownership and cross-asset integration.
Our Verdict
Interactive Brokers winsby 0.3 pts
Interactive Brokers edges ACY Securities on the overall editorial score. Its stronger multi-jurisdiction regulation and platform depth contribute to the advantage.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1IBKR offers 9 coins vs ACY's 8.
- 2IBKR has a compensation scheme; ACY does not.
- 3IBKR has a proprietary platform; ACY Securities does not.
Who should choose ACY Securities vs Interactive Brokers?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose ACY Securities if…
Choose ACY Securities if you prefer ASIC regulation and ECN-style crypto CFDs with MT4/MT5.
Choose Interactive Brokers if…
Choose Interactive Brokers if you want real crypto ownership and a cross-asset platform.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
Interactive Brokers wins for security with US-SEC/FINRA and multi-jurisdictional oversight.
Best for low fees
Recommended
ACY Securities vs Interactive Brokers: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  ACY Securities |  Interactive Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.7/ 5 | 4.0/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | $50 | No minimum▼ lower |
| Spreads From | 0 pips▼ lower | 0.2 pips |
| Taker Fee | 7.00% | 2.00%▼ lower |
ACY Securities vs Interactive Brokers Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- ASIC regulated with segregated client funds
- ECN execution with competitive raw spreads on crypto CFDs
- MT4/MT5 with professional charting toolkit
Cons
- Limited crypto selection vs dedicated exchanges
- Customer support quality inconsistent vs tier-1 brokers
ACY Securities vs Interactive Brokers: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
0
ACY Securities
criteria wins
1
Interactive Brokers
criteria win
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | ACY Securities | Interactive Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Fail | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
ACY Securities vs Interactive Brokers: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: ACY Securities rates 3.7/5 and Interactive Brokers rates 4/5. Interactive Brokers has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
ACY Securities lists a lower spread from 0, compared with Interactive Brokers's 0.2. Crypto trading costs are typically quoted as a percentage of the trade value; check each exchange's full fee schedule, as maker/taker rates and volume discounts vary.
Interactive Brokers has no minimum deposit, while ACY Securities requires at least $50. This makes Interactive Brokers more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
Both ACY Securities and Interactive Brokers hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each exchange's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, two factors stand out: Interactive Brokers has no minimum deposit, removing the capital barrier entirely, and both exchanges provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
ACY Securities offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus Interactive Brokers's 1:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
Interactive Brokers charges $2 per trade, lower than ACY Securities's $7 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
ACY Securities supports MetaTrader 5, TradingView, MetaTrader 4, while Interactive Brokers supports Trader Workstation (TWS), Proprietary Web/Mobile. ACY Securities has exclusive access to MetaTrader 5 and TradingView and MetaTrader 4. Interactive Brokers has exclusive access to Trader Workstation (TWS) and Proprietary Web/Mobile.
Interactive Brokers scores better on fee criteria (no deposit fee, no inactivity fee). Always check both exchanges' current fee schedules, as maker/taker rates and withdrawal fees vary and are subject to change.
