Fusion Markets vs Interactive Brokers Crypto Exchange Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of Fusion Markets and Interactive Brokers across security, fees, coin selection, staking, and editorial scoring.
Score 3.8 / 5
Fusion Markets is an ASIC-regulated Australian ECN broker with among the lowest trading costs in the industry - including competitive crypto CFD pricing with zero-commission raw spread accounts.
VS
Score 4 / 5
Interactive Brokers offers real cryptocurrency ownership (not CFDs) on Bitcoin, Ethereum, and select altcoins via its regulated IBKR platform - backed by SEC, FINRA, and FCA oversight, making it one of the safest regulated routes to crypto for sophisticated investors.
Our Verdict
Interactive Brokers winsby 0.2 pts
Interactive Brokers edges ahead with a score of 4/5 vs Fusion Markets's 3.8/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
It's a tie
Both equally suited
Both exchanges show an equally strong security profile across cold storage, proof of reserves, and regulatory oversight.
Best for low fees
It's a tie
Both equally suited
Both exchanges offer equivalent fee conditions — no deposit fee and no inactivity fee.
Best for beginners
Recommended
Interactive Brokers edges out Fusion Markets with a higher editorial score (4/5 vs 3.8/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new crypto traders.
Best for coin selection
Insufficient data
Data not yet available
Coin-selection data is not yet available for this pair. Check each exchange's supported assets page to compare the number of tradeable cryptocurrencies.
Best for DeFi & Web3
Insufficient data
Data not yet available
DeFi and NFT feature data is not yet available for this pair. Check each exchange's Web3 product pages directly.
Fusion Markets vs Interactive Brokers: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  Fusion Markets |  Interactive Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial Score | 3.8/ 5 | 4.0/ 5 |
| Min. Deposit | No minimum | No minimum |
| Regulators | ASIC VFSC | FCA CMF FINRA SEC ASIC JFSA AMF DFSA CMVM CNV NFA IIROC SFC CBI CNB FSC SEBI MFSA |
| Cold Storage | No | No |
| Proof of Reserves | No | No |
| Staking | No | No |
| DeFi Integration | No | No |
| NFT Trading | No | No |
| 500+ Coins | No | No |
| P2P Trading | No | No |
| Crypto Earn / Savings | No | No |
| Token Launchpad | No | No |
| Visit exchange | Visit Fusion Markets | Visit Interactive Brokers |
Fusion Markets vs Interactive Brokers Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- Among the lowest ECN commissions available - $2.25 per lot round-turn
- ASIC regulated with negative balance protection for retail clients
- Zero minimum deposit - fully accessible
Cons
- Limited crypto pair selection
- No proprietary platform - MT4/MT5 only
- Less brand visibility than larger ASIC competitors
Pros
- Real crypto ownership (not CFDs) - Bitcoin, Ethereum, and major alts in your IBKR account
- SEC, FINRA, FCA, and ASIC regulated - strongest multi-jurisdictional framework available
- 0.12–0.18% transparent commission - no spread markup on underlying price
- Manage crypto alongside stocks, ETFs, bonds, and forex in a single platform
Cons
- Narrow selection (~9 coins) - no access to altcoins, DeFi, or NFTs
- No staking or crypto-to-crypto trading
- No self-custody wallet withdrawals
- US clients face 24/7 availability restrictions due to regulatory requirements
Fusion Markets vs Interactive Brokers: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
0
Fusion Markets
criteria wins
1
Interactive Brokers
criteria win
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | Fusion Markets | Interactive Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Fail | Fail |
| Phone support | Fail | Pass |
Fusion Markets vs Interactive Brokers: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, Interactive Brokers ranks higher with a score of 4/5 vs 3.8/5 for Fusion Markets. The best choice still depends on your individual needs — security, coin selection, fees, and staking offerings all matter.
Fusion Markets and Interactive Brokers show a similar security profile in our data. Both should be evaluated on cold storage practices, proof of reserves, regulatory oversight, and whether client funds are held separately from operational funds.
Fusion Markets and Interactive Brokers appear similar on fee criteria in our data. Compare each exchange's trading fee schedule directly, as crypto fees vary by asset, volume tier, and payment method.
Neither Fusion Markets nor Interactive Brokers is listed as offering staking in our data. Check each exchange's website directly for the most up-to-date staking offerings, as this feature changes frequently.
Both Fusion Markets and Interactive Brokers require a minimum deposit of no minimum to start trading.
For beginners: Interactive Brokers has a higher overall editorial score. Also consider each exchange's educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of their user interface before deciding.
More Crypto Exchange Comparisons
More Fusion Markets comparisons
More Interactive Brokers comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker