Admiralsvs
AMarketsCrypto Exchange Comparison
This comparison pits Admirals and AMarkets in a crypto CFD matchup across regulation and asset depth, alongside platform ecosystems. The tension centers on safety versus flexibility.
Our Verdict
Admirals winsClear Winner
Admirals leads on the editorial score, backed by FCA, ASIC, CySEC and KNF regulation plus FSCS protection up to GBP 85,000 for UK retail clients.
Admirals
3.9/5
AMarkets
3.3/5
Key Differences
- 1Admirals offers 30+ coins versus AMarkets' 8.
- 2Top-tier regulation with FSCS protection versus offshore SVG/FSA oversight.
- 3Negative balance protection is available at Admirals but not AMarkets.
Who should choose Admirals vs AMarkets?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose Admirals if…
Choose Admirals if you want strong multi‑jurisdiction regulation and FSCS protection for UK clients. You also access 30+ crypto CFDs on MT4/MT5 with a broad multi-asset offering.
Choose AMarkets if…
Choose AMarkets if you accept offshore SVG/FSA regulation and high leverage. You can use MT4/MT5 with copy trading and access 8 crypto CFDs.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
Recommended
Admirals wins for security due to multi‑jurisdiction regulation and FSCS protection.
Best for low fees
Recommended
Admirals vs AMarkets: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  Admirals |  AMarkets |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.9/ 5 | 3.3/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | No minimum▼ lower | $100 |
| Spreads From | 0.5 pips | 0 pips▼ lower |
| Taker Fee | 6.00% | 6.00% |
Admirals vs AMarkets Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- 30+ crypto CFDs on MT4 and MT5 under FCA, CySEC, and ASIC regulation
- MetaTrader Supreme Edition plugin adds enhanced charting and sentiment tools
- No minimum deposit; FSCS protection up to GBP 85,000 for UK retail clients
- Broad multi-asset offering, crypto alongside forex, equities, ETFs, and commodities
Cons
- CFDs only, no real crypto ownership, staking, or on-chain access
Admirals vs AMarkets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
2
Admirals
criteria wins
0
AMarkets
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | Admirals | AMarkets |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
Admirals vs AMarkets: Frequently Asked Questions
Admirals rates 3.9/5 versus 3.3/5 for AMarkets. Admirals edges ahead on our composite score, though both exchanges meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
AMarkets lists a lower spread from 0, compared with Admirals's 0.5. Crypto trading costs are typically quoted as a percentage of the trade value; check each exchange's full fee schedule, as maker/taker rates and volume discounts vary.
Admirals has no minimum deposit, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes Admirals more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
Admirals holds top-tier regulation (FCA, ASIC, CySEC), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
Admirals stands out for beginners: it has a lower entry point and provides negative balance protection, which caps losses at your deposited amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
Admirals offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus AMarkets's 2:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
Both Admirals and AMarkets charge the same commission of $6 per trade on applicable accounts. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
Admirals supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while AMarkets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. AMarkets has exclusive access to cTrader.
Admirals scores better on fee criteria (no deposit fee, no inactivity fee). Always check both exchanges' current fee schedules, as maker/taker rates and withdrawal fees vary and are subject to change.
