AMarketsvs
ThinkMarketsCrypto Exchange Comparison
Two CFD brokers face off on regulation, platform quality, and crypto options. The tension hinges on security, coin depth, and fee structure as traders weigh offshore risk against regulated access.
Our Verdict
ThinkMarkets winsby 0.5 pts
ThinkMarkets edges AMarkets on the editorial score and regulatory scope, with broader coin coverage and negative balance protection.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1Coin selection: ThinkMarkets lists 20 coins, AMarkets lists 8.
- 2Top-tier regulation and compensation on ThinkMarkets vs SVG/FSA on AMarkets.
- 3Negative balance protection: ThinkMarkets provides; AMarkets does not.
Who should choose AMarkets vs ThinkMarkets?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose AMarkets if…
Choose AMarkets if you want MT4/MT5 and cTrader access with eight crypto CFDs under offshore SVG/FSA regulation.
Choose ThinkMarkets if…
Choose ThinkMarkets if you want more coins and stronger regulation with client protection and ThinkTrader.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
Recommended
ThinkMarkets wins for security with multi-jurisdictional oversight and client protection.
Best for low fees
Recommended
AMarkets vs ThinkMarkets: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  AMarkets |  ThinkMarkets |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.3/ 5 | 3.8/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | $100 | No minimum▼ lower |
| Spreads From | 0 pips▼ lower | 0.4 pips |
| Taker Fee | 6.00%▼ lower | 7.00% |
AMarkets vs ThinkMarkets Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- Crypto CFDs available with high leverage options
- MT4/MT5 with copy trading integration
- Low spreads on standard and ECN account types
Cons
- Offshore regulation (SVG/FSA), minimal investor protection
- 3000:1 leverage on forex is extremely high-risk
AMarkets vs ThinkMarkets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
0
AMarkets
criteria wins
2
ThinkMarkets
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | ThinkMarkets |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs ThinkMarkets: Frequently Asked Questions
ThinkMarkets rates 3.8/5 versus 3.3/5 for AMarkets. ThinkMarkets edges ahead on our composite score, though both exchanges meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
AMarkets lists a lower spread from 0, compared with ThinkMarkets's 0.4. Crypto trading costs are typically quoted as a percentage of the trade value; check each exchange's full fee schedule, as maker/taker rates and volume discounts vary.
ThinkMarkets has no minimum deposit, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes ThinkMarkets more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
ThinkMarkets holds top-tier regulation (FCA, ASIC, FSCA), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
ThinkMarkets stands out for beginners: it has a lower entry point and provides negative balance protection, which caps losses at your deposited amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
AMarkets offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus ThinkMarkets's 2:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
AMarkets charges $6 per trade, lower than ThinkMarkets's $7 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
AMarkets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while ThinkMarkets supports MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, TradingView, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. AMarkets has exclusive access to cTrader. ThinkMarkets has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile and TradingView.
ThinkMarkets scores better on fee criteria (no deposit fee, no inactivity fee). Always check both exchanges' current fee schedules, as maker/taker rates and withdrawal fees vary and are subject to change.
