AMarketsvs
Fusion MarketsCrypto Exchange Comparison
Two CFD brokers square off over crypto exposure, weighing regulatory risk, pricing, and platform reach. The axis of tension pits safety against cost efficiency.
Our Verdict
Fusion Markets winsby 0.5 pts
Fusion Markets edges ahead of AMarkets on editorial score, reflecting stronger regulatory framing and pricing transparency. AMarkets remains a viable offshore option for aggressive traders.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1AMarkets provides 24/5 live chat and phone support.
- 2Fusion Markets has top-tier regulator status and negative balance protection.
- 3AMarkets requires a $100 minimum deposit while Fusion has none.
Who should choose AMarkets vs Fusion Markets?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose AMarkets if…
Choose AMarkets if you want 24/5 live chat, phone support, and multilingual assistance.
Choose Fusion Markets if…
Choose Fusion Markets if you value top-tier regulation, negative balance protection, and a zero-deposit option.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
Recommended
Fusion Markets wins for security, backed by ASIC regulation and negative balance protection.
Best for low fees
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
Fusion Markets offers among the lowest ECN commissions at $2.25 per lot round-turn.
AMarkets vs Fusion Markets: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  AMarkets |  Fusion Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.3/ 5 | 3.8/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | $100 | No minimum▼ lower |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Taker Fee | 6.00% | 4.50%▼ lower |
AMarkets vs Fusion Markets Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- Crypto CFDs available with high leverage options
- MT4/MT5 with copy trading integration
- Low spreads on standard and ECN account types
Cons
- Offshore regulation (SVG/FSA), minimal investor protection
- 3000:1 leverage on forex is extremely high-risk
AMarkets vs Fusion Markets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
2
AMarkets
criteria wins
3
Fusion Markets
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | Fusion Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Fail |
AMarkets vs Fusion Markets: Frequently Asked Questions
Fusion Markets rates 3.8/5 versus 3.3/5 for AMarkets. Fusion Markets edges ahead on our composite score, though both exchanges meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
Both AMarkets and Fusion Markets list the same spread figure of 0. Compare each exchange's full fee schedule, including maker/taker rates and any volume discounts, to evaluate total trading costs.
Fusion Markets has no minimum deposit, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes Fusion Markets more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
Fusion Markets holds top-tier regulation (ASIC, VFSC), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
Fusion Markets stands out for beginners: it has a lower entry point and provides negative balance protection, which caps losses at your deposited amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
AMarkets offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus Fusion Markets's 2:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
Fusion Markets charges $4.5 per trade, lower than AMarkets's $6 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
AMarkets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Fusion Markets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide cTrader and MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4.
Fusion Markets scores better on fee criteria (no deposit fee, no inactivity fee). Always check both exchanges' current fee schedules, as maker/taker rates and withdrawal fees vary and are subject to change.
