easyMarketsvs
Interactive BrokersCrypto Exchange Comparison
In this matchup, two CFD/non-native crypto brokers square off on security, coin selection, and fee structure. The tension between ownership models and regulation invites close scrutiny.
Our Verdict
Interactive Brokers winsby 0.5 pts
Interactive Brokers outperforms easyMarkets on editorial score and regulatory breadth, offering real crypto ownership and broader oversight. EasyMarkets provides fixed spreads and guaranteed stop-loss protections.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1Real crypto ownership is offered by Interactive Brokers.
- 2EasyMarkets uses fixed crypto CFD spreads.
- 3Interactive Brokers uses transparent pricing with no spread markup.
Who should choose easyMarkets vs Interactive Brokers?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose easyMarkets if…
Choose easyMarkets if you want fixed crypto CFD spreads and a guaranteed stop-loss to manage gaps.
Choose Interactive Brokers if…
Choose Interactive Brokers if you want real crypto ownership and a broad, multi-jurisdictional regulatory footprint.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
Interactive Brokers benefits from extensive multi-jurisdictional regulation supporting security.
Best for low fees
Recommended
easyMarkets vs Interactive Brokers: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  easyMarkets |  Interactive Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.5/ 5 | 4.0/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | $25 | No minimum▼ lower |
| Spreads From | 0.7 pips | 0.2 pips▼ lower |
| Taker Fee | N/A | 2.00% |
easyMarkets vs Interactive Brokers Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- Fixed spreads on crypto CFDs eliminate re-quote risk
- Guaranteed stop-loss (dealCancellation) uniquely protects against crypto gaps
- CySEC and ASIC regulated with negative balance protection
Cons
- Fixed spreads are wider than ECN alternatives for crypto
- Limited crypto selection vs dedicated exchanges
easyMarkets vs Interactive Brokers: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
1
easyMarkets
criteria win
1
Interactive Brokers
criteria win
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | easyMarkets | Interactive Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
easyMarkets vs Interactive Brokers: Frequently Asked Questions
Interactive Brokers rates 4/5 versus 3.5/5 for easyMarkets. Interactive Brokers edges ahead on our composite score, though both exchanges meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
Interactive Brokers lists a lower spread from 0.2, compared with easyMarkets's 0.7. Crypto trading costs are typically quoted as a percentage of the trade value; check each exchange's full fee schedule, as maker/taker rates and volume discounts vary.
Interactive Brokers has no minimum deposit, while easyMarkets requires at least $25. This makes Interactive Brokers more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
Both easyMarkets and Interactive Brokers hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each exchange's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, two factors stand out: Interactive Brokers has no minimum deposit, removing the capital barrier entirely, and both exchanges provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
easyMarkets offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus Interactive Brokers's 1:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
Interactive Brokers charges $2 per trade on commission-based accounts. Commission details for easyMarkets are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
easyMarkets supports MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, MetaTrader 4, while Interactive Brokers supports Trader Workstation (TWS), Proprietary Web/Mobile. Both provide Proprietary Web/Mobile. easyMarkets has exclusive access to MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. Interactive Brokers has exclusive access to Trader Workstation (TWS).
