easyMarkets vs Saxo Bank Crypto Exchange Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of easyMarkets and Saxo Bank across security, fees, coin selection, staking, and editorial scoring.
Score 3.5 / 5
easyMarkets offers crypto CFDs with its signature fixed spreads and guaranteed stop-loss - a unique risk management framework for digital asset exposure under CySEC and ASIC regulation.
VS
Score 3.9 / 5
Saxo Bank offers cryptocurrency CFDs on Bitcoin, Ethereum, and select major tokens via SaxoTraderGO - backed by Danish banking regulation and institutional-grade custody, though the selection is narrow and CFD-only with no real coin ownership.
Our Verdict
Saxo Bank winsby 0.4 pts
Saxo Bank edges ahead with a score of 3.9/5 vs easyMarkets's 3.5/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
It's a tie
Both equally suited
Both exchanges show an equally strong security profile across cold storage, proof of reserves, and regulatory oversight.
Best for low fees
Recommended
easyMarkets has a lower fee profile: no deposit fee, no inactivity fee.
Best for beginners
Recommended
Saxo Bank edges out easyMarkets with a higher editorial score (3.9/5 vs 3.5/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new crypto traders.
Best for coin selection
Insufficient data
Data not yet available
Coin-selection data is not yet available for this pair. Check each exchange's supported assets page to compare the number of tradeable cryptocurrencies.
Best for DeFi & Web3
Insufficient data
Data not yet available
DeFi and NFT feature data is not yet available for this pair. Check each exchange's Web3 product pages directly.
easyMarkets vs Saxo Bank: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  easyMarkets |  Saxo Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial Score | 3.5/ 5 | 3.9/ 5 |
| Min. Deposit | $25 | No minimum |
| Regulators | ASIC CySEC CNV MNB HCMC | FCA ASIC JFSA ACPR CNMV DFSA FINMA Finansinspektionen Finanstilsynet CMA MAS SFC CBI FSC Finanstilsynet KNF MFSA |
| Cold Storage | No | No |
| Proof of Reserves | No | No |
| Staking | No | No |
| DeFi Integration | No | No |
| NFT Trading | No | No |
| 500+ Coins | No | No |
| P2P Trading | No | No |
| Crypto Earn / Savings | No | No |
| Token Launchpad | No | No |
| Visit exchange | Visit easyMarkets | Visit Saxo Bank |
easyMarkets vs Saxo Bank Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- Fixed spreads on crypto CFDs eliminate re-quote risk
- Guaranteed stop-loss (dealCancellation) uniquely protects against crypto gaps
- CySEC and ASIC regulated with negative balance protection
Cons
- Fixed spreads are wider than ECN alternatives for crypto
- Limited crypto selection vs dedicated exchanges
- dealCancellation feature has a cost that erodes profitability
Pros
- Danish banking licence - highest regulatory framework among retail crypto providers
- Integrated crypto CFDs on SaxoTraderGO alongside stocks, FX, bonds, and futures
- Audited public accounts provide financial transparency not available from most crypto platforms
- 20+ major crypto CFDs including BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, and other leading tokens
Cons
- CFDs only - no real crypto ownership, staking, or on-chain access
- Narrower selection (~20 coins) vs dedicated crypto exchanges
- Classic tier spreads (0.5–1.5%) are wider than ECN alternatives
- No inactivity-exempt tier - monthly fees apply to low-balance accounts
easyMarkets vs Saxo Bank: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
2
easyMarkets
criteria wins
1
Saxo Bank
criteria win
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | easyMarkets | Saxo Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
easyMarkets vs Saxo Bank: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, Saxo Bank ranks higher with a score of 3.9/5 vs 3.5/5 for easyMarkets. The best choice still depends on your individual needs — security, coin selection, fees, and staking offerings all matter.
easyMarkets and Saxo Bank show a similar security profile in our data. Both should be evaluated on cold storage practices, proof of reserves, regulatory oversight, and whether client funds are held separately from operational funds.
easyMarkets has a lower fee profile, with no deposit fee and no inactivity fee. Always check each platform's trading fee schedule directly, as crypto exchange fees vary by asset, trading volume, and account tier.
Neither easyMarkets nor Saxo Bank is listed as offering staking in our data. Check each exchange's website directly for the most up-to-date staking offerings, as this feature changes frequently.
Saxo Bank has a lower minimum deposit of no minimum required, while easyMarkets requires at least $25. This makes Saxo Bank more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
For beginners: Saxo Bank has a lower minimum deposit (no minimum); Saxo Bank has a higher overall editorial score. Also consider each exchange's educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of their user interface before deciding.
More Crypto Exchange Comparisons
More easyMarkets comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker