Capital.comvs
Interactive BrokersCrypto Exchange Comparison
This matchup contrasts Capital.com's AI-enhanced crypto CFDs with Interactive Brokers' real-ownership approach. The tension centers on asset breadth, pricing clarity, and platform experience.
Our Verdict
Too close to call
Capital.com and Interactive Brokers are closely matched, with Capital.com offering a far broader crypto CFD selection (200 vs 9) as the clearest differentiator.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1Coin selection breadth: Capital.com lists 200 crypto CFDs while Interactive Brokers has 9 coins.
- 2Support channels: Capital.com offers 24/5 live chat; Interactive Brokers provides phone support.
- 3Pricing transparency: Interactive Brokers has transparent pricing; Capital.com does not.
Who should choose Capital.com vs Interactive Brokers?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose Capital.com if…
Choose Capital.com if you want broad crypto CFDs (200 coins) and 24/5 live chat support.
Choose Interactive Brokers if…
Choose Interactive Brokers if you prefer real crypto ownership, phone support, and transparent pricing.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
Interactive Brokers wins for security due to its broad, multi-jurisdictional regulatory coverage.
Best for low fees
Recommended
Capital.com vs Interactive Brokers: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  Capital.com |  Interactive Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 4.0/ 5 | 4.0/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | $20 | No minimum▼ lower |
| Spreads From | 0.6 pips | 0.2 pips▼ lower |
| Taker Fee | N/A | 2.00% |
Capital.com vs Interactive Brokers Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- 200+ crypto CFDs, widest regulated crypto CFD selection among multi-asset brokers
- AI-powered trading insights identify behavioural biases and risk patterns
- FCA, ASIC, and CySEC regulated with no minimum deposit and no inactivity fee
- No commission on any CFD instrument including all crypto pairs
Cons
- CFDs only, no real crypto ownership, staking, or on-chain access
Capital.com vs Interactive Brokers: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
1
Capital.com
criteria win
2
Interactive Brokers
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | Capital.com | Interactive Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Fail | Pass |
Capital.com vs Interactive Brokers: Frequently Asked Questions
Capital.com and Interactive Brokers share the same editorial score of 4/5. One concrete differentiator: Interactive Brokers requires a lower minimum deposit.
Interactive Brokers lists a lower spread from 0.2, compared with Capital.com's 0.6. Crypto trading costs are typically quoted as a percentage of the trade value; check each exchange's full fee schedule, as maker/taker rates and volume discounts vary.
Interactive Brokers has no minimum deposit, while Capital.com requires at least $20. This makes Interactive Brokers more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
Both Capital.com and Interactive Brokers hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each exchange's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, two factors stand out: Interactive Brokers has no minimum deposit, removing the capital barrier entirely, and both exchanges provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
Capital.com offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus Interactive Brokers's 1:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
Interactive Brokers charges $2 per trade on commission-based accounts. Commission details for Capital.com are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
Capital.com supports Proprietary Web/Mobile, while Interactive Brokers supports Trader Workstation (TWS), Proprietary Web/Mobile. Both provide Proprietary Web/Mobile. Interactive Brokers has exclusive access to Trader Workstation (TWS).
