IG vs Trading 212 Stock Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of IG and Trading 212 across regulation, commissions, platforms, and editorial scoring.
IG stands out in the UK stocks market for combining real share dealing, a Stocks & Shares ISA, listed options trading, and bonds - giving active investors a full-service, multi-asset account that most app-based platforms cannot match.
Trading 212 offers one of the UK's best commission-free stock ISA accounts alongside fractional shares and an attractive cash account. Its pies feature enables automated portfolio rebalancing for passive investors.
IG edges ahead with a score of 4.5/5 vs Trading 212's 4.2/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Trading 212 offers commission-free trading while IG does not, making Trading 212 the more cost-effective choice for frequent stock traders.
Both brokers show an equally strong safety profile across regulation, fund protection, and client safeguards.
Trading 212 is better suited for long-term investing: fractional shares, dividend reinvestment.
Both brokers offer equivalent conditions for active trading across commissions, platforms, and charting tools.
IG edges out Trading 212 with a higher editorial score (4.5/5 vs 4.2/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new stock investors.
IG vs Trading 212: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
| Editorial score | 4.5/ 5 | 4.2/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Min deposit | No minimum | $1 |
| Commission-free | No | Yes |
| Fractional shares | No | Yes |
| Dividend reinvestment | No | Yes |
| Extended hours | Yes | No |
| IPO access | No | No |
| Short selling | Yes | No |
| Regulators | FCA ASIC DFSA CMVM BaFin Finansinspektionen Finanstilsynet FMA CBI KNF Finanstilsynet | FCA CySEC |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 Proprietary Web/Mobile TradingView | Trading 212 App |
| Active bonuses | None | 2 offers |
| Visit broker | Visit IG | Visit Trading 212 |
IG vs Trading 212 Stock Broker Pros & Cons
- Exchange-listed options trading alongside real share dealing in one account
- Bonds trading available in the same account as equities and options
- Stocks & Shares ISA with no annual platform fee
- 13,000+ shares across 30+ global exchanges
- FCA-regulated and LSE-listed - among the highest regulatory standards in UK retail
- Integrated ProRealTime charts, Reuters news, and Morningstar research
- Share dealing commission (£8 or 0.1%) is higher than commission-free platforms
- No SIPP - pension wrapper requires a separate provider
- Options trading requires a DMA account and is not available to all retail clients
- No fractional shares on the share dealing account
- Commission-free real stock and ETF trading
- Stocks & Shares ISA available
- Fractional shares from €1
- Competitive cash interest account (Flexi Cash)
- Automated portfolio pies for passive investing
- Regulated by FCA with FSCS protection
- Limited research tools and market depth data
- No SIPP pension account option
- CFD offering is separate and carries higher risk
- Customer support is primarily app-based
IG vs Trading 212: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | IG | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Pass | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Pass |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Pass |
| Extended hours trading | Pass | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Fail |
| Stock screener tool | Pass | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Fail |
| 24/5 live chat | Fail | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Fail |
IG vs Trading 212: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, IG ranks higher with a score of 4.5/5 vs 4.2/5 for Trading 212. The best choice still depends on your needs — commissions, features like fractional shares, and regulatory coverage all matter.
Trading 212 offers commission-free stock trading while IG does not according to our data. Commission-free trading can significantly reduce costs for frequent traders. Always confirm the current fee structure directly on each broker's website.
Both IG and Trading 212 hold top-tier regulatory licences, indicating a high standard of investor protection. Confirm each broker's specific regulatory bodies and compensation scheme coverage to ensure they apply in your jurisdiction.
IG has a lower minimum deposit of no minimum required, while Trading 212 requires at least $1. This makes IG more accessible for traders starting with limited capital.
IG supports MetaTrader 4, Proprietary Web/Mobile, TradingView and Trading 212 offers Trading 212 App. Platform availability affects the tools, charting, and order types available to you. If you rely on a specific platform like MetaTrader or a proprietary web app, confirm compatibility before opening an account.
For beginners: IG has a lower minimum deposit (no minimum); IG has a higher overall editorial score. Also compare educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of each broker's platform before deciding.
More Stock Broker Comparisons
More IG comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker