FXTMvs
Trading 212Stock Broker Comparison
Two brokers contrast in approach: FXTM leans on regulated multi-asset CFDs and MT4/MT5, while Trading 212 prioritizes commission-free stock trading and a consumer-friendly app.
Our Verdict
Trading 212 winsby 0.5 pts
Trading 212 edges FXTM on the editorial score, reflecting a higher overall rating and its commission-free stock trading model.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1FXTM offers advanced charting features.
- 2Trading 212 provides a Stocks & Shares ISA.
- 3FXTM provides access to six exchanges.
Who should choose FXTM vs Trading 212?
Find out which stock broker best suits your investing profile.
Choose FXTM if…
FXTM for access to six exchanges and advanced charting. Trading 212 for ISA access and fractional shares.
Choose Trading 212 if…
FXTM for access to six exchanges and advanced charting. Trading 212 for ISA access and fractional shares.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
Trading 212 offers commission-free stock trading, reducing ongoing costs.
Best for safety & regulation
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
FXTM vs Trading 212: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.7/ 5 | 4.2/ 5 |
| Min deposit | No minimum▼ lower | $1 |
| Spreads from | 1.5 pips | N/A |
| Commission / lot | N/A | N/A |
| Inactivity fee | None | None |
| Deposit fee |
FXTM vs Trading 212 Stock Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
- CySEC and FCA regulated, strong dual-jurisdiction for EU and UK client protection
- FXTM Invest copy trading enables following of equity-focused Strategy Managers
- 180+ share CFDs via MT4 and MT5 with strong emerging market accessibility
- No inactivity fee; multilingual support in 35+ languages
Cons
- Narrowest stock range (180+) among regulated multi-platform equity CFD brokers
FXTM vs Trading 212: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
3
FXTM
criteria wins
3
Trading 212
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | FXTM | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Pass | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Pass |
| No deposit fee | — | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Pass |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Pass |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Fail |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Fail |
| 24/5 live chat | Fail | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Fail |
FXTM vs Trading 212: Frequently Asked Questions
Trading 212 rates 4.2/5 versus 3.7/5 for FXTM. Trading 212 edges ahead on our composite score, though both brokers meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
FXTM starts from 1.5. Current spread data is not available for Trading 212. Check both brokers' websites for up-to-date spread and commission pricing.
FXTM has no minimum deposit, while Trading 212 requires at least $1. This makes FXTM more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Both FXTM and Trading 212 hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, two factors stand out: FXTM has no minimum deposit, removing the capital barrier entirely, and both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
FXTM lists maximum leverage of 20:1, while Trading 212 lists up to 1:5. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
FXTM supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Trading 212 supports Trading 212 App. FXTM has exclusive access to MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. Trading 212 has exclusive access to Trading 212 App.
Trading 212 offers commission-free stock trading while FXTM does not according to our data. Commission-free trading can reduce costs for frequent traders. Always confirm the current fee structure directly on each broker's website.
Both FXTM and Trading 212 are covered by a compensation scheme according to our data, providing an additional safety net for your stock investments. Confirm the specific scheme and coverage limit that applies to your account before depositing.
