FXTM vs Pepperstone Stock Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of FXTM and Pepperstone across regulation, commissions, platforms, and editorial scoring.
FXTM offers share CFDs on 180+ global stocks via MT4 and MT5 under CySEC and FCA regulation - a well-regulated broker with a strong emerging market presence and integrated FXTM Invest copy trading for equity strategies.
Pepperstone offers share CFDs on 1,000+ global stocks across MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView under FCA and ASIC regulation - a convenient route to equity CFD exposure for existing Pepperstone traders without switching brokers.
Pepperstone edges ahead with a score of 3.9/5 vs FXTM's 3.7/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Both brokers show an equally strong safety profile across regulation, fund protection, and client safeguards.
Pepperstone has the edge for active traders: more platform options, advanced charting.
Pepperstone edges out FXTM with a higher editorial score (3.9/5 vs 3.7/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new stock investors.
Commission data is not yet available for this pair. Check each broker's pricing page to compare trading costs directly.
Long-term investing feature data (fractional shares, dividend reinvestment, IPO access) is not yet available for this pair.
FXTM vs Pepperstone: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
| Editorial score | 3.7/ 5 | 3.9/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Min deposit | No minimum | No minimum |
| Commission-free | No | No |
| Fractional shares | No | No |
| Dividend reinvestment | No | No |
| Extended hours | No | No |
| IPO access | No | No |
| Short selling | Yes | Yes |
| Regulators | FCA FSCA CySEC FSC | FCA ASIC CySEC DFSA BaFin FMA |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader TradingView IRESS |
| Visit broker | Visit FXTM | Visit Pepperstone |
FXTM vs Pepperstone Stock Broker Pros & Cons
- CySEC and FCA regulated - strong dual-jurisdiction for EU and UK client protection
- FXTM Invest copy trading enables following of equity-focused Strategy Managers
- 180+ share CFDs via MT4 and MT5 with strong emerging market accessibility
- No inactivity fee; multilingual support in 35+ languages
- Narrowest stock range (180+) among regulated multi-platform equity CFD brokers
- Share CFDs only - no real ownership, ISA, or dividend entitlement
- FSC Mauritius entity provides substantially lighter regulatory protection
- Limited stock analytical tools beyond standard MT4/MT5 charting
- 1,000+ share CFDs on MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView - same account as forex
- FCA, ASIC, CySEC, BaFin, and DFSA regulated - deepest multi-regulatory profile among ECN brokers
- IRESS available for DMA access to ASX and global equity markets
- Transparent commission structure on share CFDs (0.07%/side, min £7 on UK shares)
- 1,000+ stock selection narrower than CMC Markets (10,000+) or dedicated stockbrokers
- No real share ownership, ISA wrapper, or dividend reinvestment programme
- IRESS DMA incurs a monthly fee for lower-volume traders
- Not suitable as a primary equity broker for buy-and-hold investors
FXTM vs Pepperstone: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | FXTM | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Pass | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Fail | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Fail |
FXTM vs Pepperstone: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, Pepperstone ranks higher with a score of 3.9/5 vs 3.7/5 for FXTM. The best choice still depends on your needs — commissions, features like fractional shares, and regulatory coverage all matter.
Neither FXTM nor Pepperstone is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
Both FXTM and Pepperstone hold top-tier regulatory licences, indicating a high standard of investor protection. Confirm each broker's specific regulatory bodies and compensation scheme coverage to ensure they apply in your jurisdiction.
Both FXTM and Pepperstone require a minimum deposit of no minimum to open a live trading account.
FXTM supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and Pepperstone offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView, IRESS. Platform availability affects the tools, charting, and order types available to you. If you rely on a specific platform like MetaTrader or a proprietary web app, confirm compatibility before opening an account.
For beginners: Pepperstone has a higher overall editorial score. Also compare educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of each broker's platform before deciding.
More Stock Broker Comparisons
More FXTM comparisons
More Pepperstone comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker