Exness vs FXTM Stock Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of Exness and FXTM across regulation, commissions, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Exness offers share CFDs on 100+ global stocks via MT4, MT5, and the Exness Terminal under CySEC and FCA regulation - an accessible multi-platform entry point for share CFD exposure with ultra-low minimum deposits.
FXTM offers share CFDs on 180+ global stocks via MT4 and MT5 under CySEC and FCA regulation - a well-regulated broker with a strong emerging market presence and integrated FXTM Invest copy trading for equity strategies.
FXTM edges ahead with a score of 3.7/5 vs Exness's 3.6/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Both brokers show an equally strong safety profile across regulation, fund protection, and client safeguards.
Both brokers offer equivalent conditions for active trading across commissions, platforms, and charting tools.
FXTM edges out Exness with a higher editorial score (3.7/5 vs 3.6/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new stock investors.
Commission data is not yet available for this pair. Check each broker's pricing page to compare trading costs directly.
Long-term investing feature data (fractional shares, dividend reinvestment, IPO access) is not yet available for this pair.
Exness vs FXTM: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
| Editorial score | 3.6/ 5 | 3.7/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Min deposit | $1 | No minimum |
| Commission-free | No | No |
| Fractional shares | No | No |
| Dividend reinvestment | No | No |
| Extended hours | No | No |
| IPO access | No | No |
| Short selling | Yes | Yes |
| Regulators | FCA FSCA CySEC OJK | FCA FSCA CySEC FSC |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 |
| Visit broker | Visit Exness | Visit FXTM |
Exness vs FXTM Stock Broker Pros & Cons
- Ultra-low minimum deposit ($1) - most accessible regulated equity CFD entry point
- Instant withdrawal processing - meaningful for traders in emerging markets
- CySEC and FCA regulated with negative balance protection for EU/UK clients
- Share CFDs on MT4, MT5, and Exness Terminal with social trading integration
- Narrowest stock selection (100+) in the regulated multi-platform tier
- Share CFDs only - no real ownership, ISA, or dividend entitlement
- Seychelles FSA international entity provides significantly lighter regulatory protection
- Platform analytical depth below CMC, IG, or Pepperstone for equity research
- CySEC and FCA regulated - strong dual-jurisdiction for EU and UK client protection
- FXTM Invest copy trading enables following of equity-focused Strategy Managers
- 180+ share CFDs via MT4 and MT5 with strong emerging market accessibility
- No inactivity fee; multilingual support in 35+ languages
- Narrowest stock range (180+) among regulated multi-platform equity CFD brokers
- Share CFDs only - no real ownership, ISA, or dividend entitlement
- FSC Mauritius entity provides substantially lighter regulatory protection
- Limited stock analytical tools beyond standard MT4/MT5 charting
Exness vs FXTM: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | Exness | FXTM |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Pass | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
Exness vs FXTM: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, FXTM ranks higher with a score of 3.7/5 vs 3.6/5 for Exness. The best choice still depends on your needs — commissions, features like fractional shares, and regulatory coverage all matter.
Neither Exness nor FXTM is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
Both Exness and FXTM hold top-tier regulatory licences, indicating a high standard of investor protection. Confirm each broker's specific regulatory bodies and compensation scheme coverage to ensure they apply in your jurisdiction.
FXTM has a lower minimum deposit of no minimum required, while Exness requires at least $1. This makes FXTM more accessible for traders starting with limited capital.
Exness supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and FXTM offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5. Platform availability affects the tools, charting, and order types available to you. If you rely on a specific platform like MetaTrader or a proprietary web app, confirm compatibility before opening an account.
For beginners: FXTM has a lower minimum deposit (no minimum); FXTM has a higher overall editorial score. Also compare educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of each broker's platform before deciding.
More Stock Broker Comparisons
More Exness comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker