AMarketsvs
AxiStock Broker Comparison
In this stock CFDs comparison, AMarkets and Axi appeal to traders with different regulatory footprints and platform ecosystems. The balance between safety, costs, and access is tested here.
Our Verdict
Axi winsby 0.5 pts
Axi edges AMarkets on editorial score, supported by a top-tier regulator profile (ASIC/FCA) and a compensation scheme, plus a proprietary platform.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1Regulatory protection differs: Axi holds ASIC/FCA (top-tier) versus AMarkets offshore SVG/FSA.
- 2Proprietary platform availability differs: Axi offers a proprietary platform, AMarkets does not.
- 3Compensation scheme is available on Axi but not AMarkets.
Who should choose AMarkets vs Axi?
Find out which stock broker best suits your investing profile.
Choose AMarkets if…
Choose AMarkets if you want ECN pricing on stock CFDs and access to MT4/MT5 with copy trading. You gain a broad product range including equity CFDs, though the offshore SVG/FSA regulation and high leverage warrant caution.
Choose Axi if…
Choose Axi if you value a strong regulatory footprint with ASIC and FCA oversight, plus access through MT4 and Axi One. You can trade 700+ share CFDs with ECN-adjacent execution and a proprietary platform option, ideal for existing Axi clients expanding into equity.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
Axi wins for safety and regulation with ASIC/FCA oversight and a compensation scheme.
Best for active traders
AMarkets vs Axi: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.2/ 5 | 3.7/ 5 |
| Min deposit | $100 | No minimum▼ lower |
| Spreads from | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission / lot | $6/lot▼ lower | $7/lot |
AMarkets vs Axi Stock Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
- Stocks CFDs with ECN pricing and competitive spreads
- MT4/MT5 with copy trading integration
- Broad product range including equity CFDs alongside forex
Cons
- Offshore regulation (SVG/FSA), minimal investor protection
- No real share ownership, CFDs only
AMarkets vs Axi: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
2
AMarkets
criteria wins
3
Axi
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | Axi |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Fail | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Fail |
AMarkets vs Axi: Frequently Asked Questions
Axi rates 3.7/5 versus 3.2/5 for AMarkets. Axi edges ahead on our composite score, though both brokers meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
Both AMarkets and Axi start from the same spread of 0. For stock trading, also compare per-trade or per-share commissions to determine the total cost per transaction.
Axi has no minimum deposit, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes Axi more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Axi holds top-tier regulation (FCA, ASIC, DFSA), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
Axi stands out for beginners: it has a lower entry point and provides negative balance protection, which caps losses at your deposited amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
AMarkets lists maximum leverage of 3000:1, while Axi lists up to 20:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
AMarkets charges $6 per trade, lower than Axi's $7 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Stock commissions may be charged as a flat rate per trade or per share; confirm the exact structure on each broker's website.
AMarkets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Axi supports DXtrade, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 4. AMarkets has exclusive access to cTrader and MetaTrader 5. Axi has exclusive access to DXtrade.
Neither AMarkets nor Axi is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
Axi scores higher on investor protection criteria, with compensation scheme coverage and segregated client funds. For stock investors, confirming compensation scheme coverage ensures your assets are protected up to a defined limit if the broker becomes insolvent.
