Forex.comvs
FXTMForex Broker Comparison
Forex.com and FXTM compete for traders on regulation, pricing, and platform choices. The comparison highlights where each excels and diverges in core cost and tools.
Our Verdict
Too close to call
Forex.com and FXTM are closely matched overall, with inactivity fees and advanced charting as the clearest differentiators.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1FXTM imposes inactivity fees; Forex.com does not.
- 2Forex.com offers advanced charting; FXTM does not.
- 3Forex.com lists 400 instruments; FXTM offers 600.
Who should choose Forex.com vs FXTM?
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
Forex.com offers tighter spreads from 1.00 pips vs 1.50 pips for FXTM, reducing trading costs.
Best for safety & regulation
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
Forex.com vs FXTM: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 4.2/ 5 | 4.2/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.3 / 5▲ | 4.2 / 5 |
Forex.com vs FXTM Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
One of the few brokers accepting US retail forex clients
Deep research tools including macro analysis
Raw spread account with competitive $7 round-turn commission
MT4, MT5 and proprietary platforms
Regulated by top-tier authorities (FCA, ASIC, CySEC)
Forex.com vs FXTM: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
2
Forex.com
criteria wins
1
FXTM
criteria win
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | Forex.com | FXTM |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Pass | Pass |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Pass | Fail |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Fail |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
Forex.com vs FXTM: Frequently Asked Questions
Forex.com and FXTM share the same editorial score of 4.2/5. One concrete differentiator: FXTM requires a lower minimum deposit.
Forex.com starts from 1 pips, tighter than FXTM's 1.5 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
FXTM has $10, while Forex.com requires at least $100. This makes FXTM more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Both Forex.com and FXTM hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, two factors stand out: FXTM requires a lower minimum deposit ($10), lowering the barrier to entry, and both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
Forex.com lists maximum leverage of 50:1, while FXTM lists up to 1000:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
Forex.com charges $7 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for FXTM are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.
Forex.com supports MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, MetaTrader 4, while FXTM supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. Forex.com has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile.
