Two well-regulated brokers line up for a close comparison across pricing, platforms, and instrument reach. The tension centers on platform choice and cost structures.
FXTM and Moneta Markets are closely matched overall. Moneta Markets differentiates itself with a proprietary platform.
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose FXTM if…
Choose FXTM if you want a very low $10 micro account minimum and strong educational resources.
Choose Moneta Markets if…
Choose Moneta Markets if you want raw ECN pricing with a $6/lot commission and a proprietary AppTrader platform.
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Moneta Markets offers tighter spreads from 0.00 pips vs 1.50 pips for FXTM, reducing trading costs.
| Editorial score | 4.2/ 5 | 4.1/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.2 / 5▲ | 4.1 / 5 |
Pros
Low $10 minimum deposit on Micro accounts
Strong copy trading via FXTM Invest platform
Extensive education, webinars, video courses, and market analysis
Multilingual support in 20+ languages
Regulated by top-tier authorities (FCA, ASIC, CySEC)
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | FXTM | Moneta Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Pass | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Fail | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
The scores are close: FXTM rates 4.2/5 and Moneta Markets rates 4.1/5. FXTM has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
Moneta Markets starts from 0 pips, tighter than FXTM's 1.5 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
FXTM has $10, while Moneta Markets requires at least $50. This makes FXTM more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Both FXTM and Moneta Markets hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, two factors stand out: FXTM requires a lower minimum deposit ($10), lowering the barrier to entry, and both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
FXTM lists maximum leverage of 1000:1, while Moneta Markets lists up to 1000:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
Moneta Markets charges $6 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for FXTM are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.
FXTM supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Moneta Markets supports MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. Moneta Markets has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile.
FXTM wins for safety and regulation due to multiple top-tier regulators and investor compensation scheme coverage.
Moneta Markets wins for active traders due to ECN pricing and a proprietary platform.
Moneta Markets is better suited for scalpers: tighter spreads from 0.00 pips.
Moneta Markets wins for platform choice with MT4/MT5 plus a proprietary AppTrader platform.
FXTM wins for beginners due to low minimum deposit and extensive education.
Moneta Markets wins for instrument variety with 1000 available instruments.
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 3.9 / 5 | 4.4 / 5▲ |
|---|
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 4.0 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
|---|
Customer Support 10% weight | 4.3 / 5▲ | 4.0 / 5 |
|---|
| Founded | 2011 | 2019 |
|---|
| Headquarters | Limassol, Cyprus | Sydney, Australia |
|---|
| Min Deposit | $10▼ lower | $50 |
|---|
| Spreads From | 1.5 pips | 0 pips▼ lower |
|---|
| Commission / lot | N/A | $6/lot |
|---|
| N/A | 0.6 pips |
| Max Leverage | 1,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
|---|
| Inactivity Fee | None | None |
|---|
| Deposit Fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Deposit methods | Bank transferCredit cardDebit cardSkrillNetellerFasaPay | Bank transferCredit cardDebit cardSkrillNeteller |
|---|
| Withdrawal methods | Bank transferCredit cardSkrillNetellerFasaPay | Bank transferCredit cardSkrillNeteller |
|---|
| Withdrawal Fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Regulators | FCA FSCA CySEC FSC | FSCA ASIC FSA Seychelles |
|---|
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5 MetaTrader 4 | MetaTrader 5 Proprietary Web/Mobile MetaTrader 4 |
|---|
| Active bonuses |
|---|
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
Investor compensation scheme coverage
Raw spread account available
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Pros
ASIC, FSCA, and FSA Seychelles licensing, choice of regulatory framework
Pro ECN account: 0.0 pip spreads with $6 commission
MT4, MT5, and proprietary AppTrader platform
Strong localisation for Africa and Asia
Regulated by top-tier authorities (FCA, ASIC, CySEC)
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Cons
Standard account spreads are not ECN-competitive
Platform choice limited to MT4 and MT5
Mauritius FSC entity offers less investor protection than FCA/CySEC
No proprietary platform
Limited charting capabilities
Cons
Founded 2019, limited track record vs established competitors
Lower brand recognition outside Africa and Asia
FSA Seychelles entity offers limited investor protection
No investor compensation scheme
Dig deeper into each broker’s features, fees, and regulation.
Score 4.1 / 5
Personalised recommendation
Answer 6 quick questions and we’ll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker