AMarkets vs OctaFX Forex Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of AMarkets and OctaFX across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.
SVG FSA-regulated broker with genuine ECN conditions on MT4, MT5, and cTrader, a well-regarded PAMM system, and an established following in Russia, Ukraine, and Central Asia.
VS
CySEC-regulated broker (EU entity) with a dominant presence in South Asia through OctaTrader copy trading - a purpose-built social trading interface popular with first-time traders across India, Pakistan, and Indonesia.
Our Verdict
OctaFX winsby 0.2 pts
OctaFX edges ahead with a score of 4/5 vs AMarkets's 3.8/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
AMarkets offers tighter spreads from 0 pips vs 0.6 pips for OctaFX, reducing trading costs.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
OctaFX has a stronger safety profile: segregated funds, negative balance protection.
Best for active traders
Recommended
AMarkets has a cost edge: raw/ECN spreads, tighter spreads from 0 pips.
Best for platform choice
Recommended
OctaFX offers more exclusive platform options: OctaTrader, a proprietary platform.
Best for beginners
Recommended
OctaFX edges out AMarkets with a higher editorial score (4/5 vs 3.8/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.
AMarkets vs OctaFX: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 3.8/ 5 | 4.0/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 3.4 / 5 | 3.8 / 5▲ |
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.0 / 5 | 4.1 / 5▲ |
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 4.1 / 5▲ | 4.0 / 5 |
Customer Support 10% weight | 3.9 / 5 | 4.1 / 5▲ |
| Founded | 2007 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Kingstown, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Kingstown, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| Min deposit | $100 | $25 |
| Spreads from | 0 pips | 0.6 pips |
| Commission / lot | $6/lot | N/A |
| Max leverage | 3000:1 | 500:1 |
| Withdrawal fee | Free | Free |
| Regulators | SVGFSA | FSCA CySEC SVGFSA |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 OctaTrader |
| Active bonuses | ||
| Visit broker | Visit AMarkets | Visit OctaFX |
AMarkets vs OctaFX Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
MT4, MT5, and cTrader all available
Competitive $6 round-turn ECN commission
Mature PAMM platform with full performance transparency
No inactivity fee
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Raw spread account available
No deposit fees
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Pros
OctaTrader copy trading platform - transparent stats, one-click follow
Localised payment methods for India, Pakistan, Indonesia
Swap-free Islamic accounts available
$25 minimum deposit, no inactivity fee
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
No deposit fees
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Multilingual customer support
Cons
SVG FSA registration only - no meaningful retail investor protection
No EU or Tier 1 licensed entity
Very high leverage (3000:1) is a risk amplifier
No top-tier regulatory licence
No negative balance protection
No investor compensation scheme
No proprietary platform
Limited charting capabilities
Cons
Most international clients are under SVG offshore entity, not CySEC
Limited product range - no stocks or bonds
Copy trading focus means limited support for advanced discretionary traders
No top-tier regulatory licence
No investor compensation scheme
No raw spread account option
Limited charting capabilities
No phone support
AMarkets vs OctaFX: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
2
AMarkets
criteria wins
2
OctaFX
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | OctaFX |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Fail |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Fail | Fail |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Fail |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs OctaFX: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, OctaFX ranks higher with a score of 4/5 vs 3.8/5 for AMarkets. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; AMarkets and OctaFX may each suit different trader profiles.
AMarkets offers tighter spreads starting from 0 pips, compared to OctaFX's spreads from 0.6 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, particularly valuable for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
OctaFX has a lower minimum deposit of $25, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes OctaFX more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
AMarkets is regulated by SVGFSA. OctaFX is regulated by FSCA, CySEC. Always confirm a broker's current regulatory status before opening an account.
For beginners: OctaFX has a lower minimum deposit ($25), lowering the barrier to entry; OctaFX offers negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.
AMarkets offers maximum leverage of 3000:1, while OctaFX offers up to 500:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.
AMarkets charges $6 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for the other broker are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.
AMarkets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader and OctaFX offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, OctaTrader; both support MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5; AMarkets exclusively offers cTrader; OctaFX exclusively offers OctaTrader.
Ready to get started?
Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.
Score 3.8 / 5
More Broker Comparisons
More AMarkets comparisons
More OctaFX comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker