A head-to-head comparison of AMarkets and InstaForex across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.
SVG FSA-regulated broker with genuine ECN conditions on MT4, MT5, and cTrader, a well-regarded PAMM system, and an established following in Russia, Ukraine, and Central Asia.
FSC BVI-regulated broker with over 17 years of operation, known for cent accounts and accessible entry conditions for beginner traders in Asia and the CIS - regulatory depth is limited under the offshore BVI framework.
AMarkets edges ahead with a score of 3.8/5 vs InstaForex's 3.6/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
AMarkets offers tighter spreads from 0 pips vs 1 pips for InstaForex, reducing trading costs.
AMarkets has a stronger safety profile: segregated funds.
AMarkets has a cost edge: raw/ECN spreads, tighter spreads from 0 pips.
AMarkets offers more exclusive platform options: MetaTrader 5, cTrader.
AMarkets edges out InstaForex with a higher editorial score (3.8/5 vs 3.6/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.
| Editorial score | 3.8/ 5 | 3.6/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 3.4 / 5▲ | 3.2 / 5 |
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.0 / 5▲ | 3.4 / 5 |
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 4.1 / 5▲ | 3.3 / 5 |
Customer Support 10% weight | 3.9 / 5▲ | 3.5 / 5 |
| Founded | 2007 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Kingstown, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Road Town, British Virgin Islands |
| Min deposit | $100 | $1 |
| Spreads from | 0 pips | 1 pips |
| Commission / lot | $6/lot | N/A |
| Max leverage | 3000:1 | 1000:1 |
| Withdrawal fee | Free | Free |
| Regulators | SVGFSA | FSC BVI CySEC |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader | MetaTrader 4 |
| Active bonuses | ||
| Visit broker | Visit AMarkets | Visit InstaForex |
Pros
MT4, MT5, and cTrader all available
Competitive $6 round-turn ECN commission
Mature PAMM platform with full performance transparency
No inactivity fee
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Raw spread account available
No deposit fees
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Pros
17+ years in operation - extensive track record
Cent accounts for micro-lot trading from $1
Very low minimum deposit
Large partner and IB network across Asia and CIS
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
Mobile trading app available
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Cons
SVG FSA registration only - no meaningful retail investor protection
No EU or Tier 1 licensed entity
Very high leverage (3000:1) is a risk amplifier
No top-tier regulatory licence
No negative balance protection
No investor compensation scheme
No proprietary platform
Limited charting capabilities
Cons
FSC BVI only - offshore licence, limited investor protection
Spreads not competitive with ECN brokers
Platform limited to MT4 - no MT5, cTrader, or proprietary option
Service quality reviews are mixed on independent forums
No top-tier regulatory licence
Client funds not segregated
No negative balance protection
No investor compensation scheme
No raw spread account option
No MetaTrader support
Limited charting capabilities
Pricing transparency could be improved
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | AMarkets | InstaForex |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Fail |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Fail |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Fail |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Fail |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Fail |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Fail |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Fail | Fail |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
Based on our independent editorial scoring, AMarkets ranks higher with a score of 3.8/5 vs 3.6/5 for InstaForex. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; AMarkets and InstaForex may each suit different trader profiles.
AMarkets offers tighter spreads starting from 0 pips, compared to InstaForex's spreads from 1 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, particularly valuable for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
InstaForex has a lower minimum deposit of $1, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes InstaForex more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
AMarkets is regulated by SVGFSA. InstaForex is regulated by FSC BVI, CySEC. Always confirm a broker's current regulatory status before opening an account.
For beginners: InstaForex has a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.
AMarkets offers maximum leverage of 3000:1, while InstaForex offers up to 1000:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.
AMarkets charges $6 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for the other broker are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.
AMarkets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader and InstaForex offers MetaTrader 4; both support MetaTrader 4; AMarkets exclusively offers MetaTrader 5, cTrader.
Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.
Score 3.6 / 5
Personalised recommendation
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker