AMarketsvs
FBSCrypto Exchange Comparison
AMarkets and FBS face off in the crypto CFD arena. The tension centers on coin depth and platform capabilities.
Our Verdict
FBS winsby 0.1 pts
AMarkets and FBS are closely matched, with AMarkets offering a larger coin selection (8 vs 6) as the clearest differentiator.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1AMarkets lists 8 coins while FBS lists 6.
- 2FBS provides a proprietary trading platform.
- 3AMarkets uses MT4/MT5 and cTrader; FBS adds a proprietary platform.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
FBS is regulated by CySEC, IFSC, and FSCA, offering broader regulatory coverage than AMarkets.
Best for low fees
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
Equally matched; both show similar fee and spread profiles.
AMarkets vs FBS: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  AMarkets |  FBS |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.3/ 5 | 3.4/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | $100 | $1▼ lower |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Taker Fee | 6.00%▼ lower | 20.00% |
AMarkets vs FBS Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- Crypto CFDs available with high leverage options
- MT4/MT5 with copy trading integration
- Low spreads on standard and ECN account types
Cons
- Offshore regulation (SVG/FSA), minimal investor protection
- 3000:1 leverage on forex is extremely high-risk
AMarkets vs FBS: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | FBS |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Fail | Fail |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs FBS: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: AMarkets rates 3.3/5 and FBS rates 3.4/5. FBS has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
Both AMarkets and FBS list the same spread figure of 0. Compare each exchange's full fee schedule, including maker/taker rates and any volume discounts, to evaluate total trading costs.
FBS has $1, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes FBS more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
AMarkets is regulated by SVGFSA. FBS is regulated by FSCA, CySEC. Confirm a exchange's current regulatory status on the relevant regulator's public register before opening an account.
For beginners, FBS requires a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry. Both exchanges otherwise share similar beginner-facing criteria in our data. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources on each exchanges's site.
AMarkets offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus FBS's 2:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
AMarkets charges $6 per trade, lower than FBS's $20 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
AMarkets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while FBS supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. AMarkets has exclusive access to cTrader.
AMarkets and FBS show similar security profiles in our data. For both exchanges, verify their current cold storage policy and whether they publish proof of reserves before depositing funds.
