easyMarketsvs
FBSCrypto Exchange Comparison
Two crypto CFD brokers stand out on accessibility versus protection. The comparison pits easyMarkets' regulator-backed safeguards against FBS's ultra-low minimum deposits and broad Asia appeal.
Our Verdict
easyMarkets winsby 0.1 pts
easyMarkets and FBS are closely matched overall, but easyMarkets provides negative balance protection that FBS lacks.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 17 crypto coins listed on easyMarkets versus 6 on FBS.
- 2No inactivity fee on easyMarkets; FBS charges inactivity fee.
- 3Top-tier regulator status for easyMarkets; FBS is not top-tier.
Who should choose easyMarkets vs FBS?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose easyMarkets if…
Choose easyMarkets for stronger regulation and negative balance protection.
Choose FBS if…
Choose FBS for ultra-low minimum deposits and broad accessibility.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
Recommended
easyMarkets wins for security with negative balance protection and a compensation scheme.
Best for low fees
Recommended
easyMarkets vs FBS: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  easyMarkets |  FBS |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.5/ 5 | 3.4/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | $25 | $1▼ lower |
| Spreads From | 0.7 pips | 0 pips▼ lower |
| Taker Fee | N/A | 20.00% |
easyMarkets vs FBS Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- Fixed spreads on crypto CFDs eliminate re-quote risk
- Guaranteed stop-loss (dealCancellation) uniquely protects against crypto gaps
- CySEC and ASIC regulated with negative balance protection
Cons
- Fixed spreads are wider than ECN alternatives for crypto
- Limited crypto selection vs dedicated exchanges
easyMarkets vs FBS: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
2
easyMarkets
criteria wins
0
FBS
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | easyMarkets | FBS |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
easyMarkets vs FBS: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: easyMarkets rates 3.5/5 and FBS rates 3.4/5. easyMarkets has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
FBS lists a lower spread from 0, compared with easyMarkets's 0.7. Crypto trading costs are typically quoted as a percentage of the trade value; check each exchange's full fee schedule, as maker/taker rates and volume discounts vary.
FBS has $1, while easyMarkets requires at least $25. This makes FBS more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
easyMarkets holds top-tier regulation (CNV, ASIC, HCMC), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, two factors stand out: FBS requires a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry, and easyMarkets provides negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
easyMarkets offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus FBS's 2:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
FBS charges $20 per trade on commission-based accounts. Commission details for easyMarkets are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
easyMarkets supports MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, MetaTrader 4, while FBS supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. easyMarkets has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile.
easyMarkets scores better on fee criteria (no deposit fee, no inactivity fee). Always check both exchanges' current fee schedules, as maker/taker rates and withdrawal fees vary and are subject to change.
