ACY Securitiesvs
FBSCrypto Exchange Comparison
Two CFD brokers face off in a crypto-focused comparison, testing governance, pricing clarity, and platform depth. The tension centers on regulation, protection measures, and the scope of crypto assets offered.
Our Verdict
ACY Securities winsby 0.3 pts
ACY Securities outperforms FBS on the editorial score and benefits from ASIC regulation with segregated client funds, plus negative balance protection and transparent pricing.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1ACY offers ASIC regulation with segregated client funds and negative balance protection.
- 2FBS offers a $1 minimum deposit and automated crypto trading.
- 3ACY provides transparent pricing while FBS pricing is not transparent.
Who should choose ACY Securities vs FBS?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose ACY Securities if…
Choose ACY Securities if you value ASIC regulation and segregated client funds. You also benefit from negative balance protection and transparent pricing.
Choose FBS if…
Choose FBS if you want a $1 minimum deposit and access to MT4/MT5. You also gain 24/7 multilingual support and automated crypto trading options.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
Recommended
ACY Securities wins for security with ASIC regulation and segregated client funds.
Best for low fees
ACY Securities vs FBS: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  ACY Securities |  FBS |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.7/ 5 | 3.4/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | $50 | $1▼ lower |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Taker Fee | 7.00%▼ lower | 20.00% |
ACY Securities vs FBS Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- ASIC regulated with segregated client funds
- ECN execution with competitive raw spreads on crypto CFDs
- MT4/MT5 with professional charting toolkit
Cons
- Limited crypto selection vs dedicated exchanges
- Customer support quality inconsistent vs tier-1 brokers
ACY Securities vs FBS: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
2
ACY Securities
criteria wins
1
FBS
criteria win
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | ACY Securities | FBS |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Fail | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
ACY Securities vs FBS: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: ACY Securities rates 3.7/5 and FBS rates 3.4/5. ACY Securities has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
Both ACY Securities and FBS list the same spread figure of 0. Compare each exchange's full fee schedule, including maker/taker rates and any volume discounts, to evaluate total trading costs.
FBS has $1, while ACY Securities requires at least $50. This makes FBS more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
ACY Securities holds top-tier regulation (ASIC, FSA Seychelles), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, two factors stand out: FBS requires a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry, and ACY Securities provides negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
ACY Securities offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus FBS's 2:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
ACY Securities charges $7 per trade, lower than FBS's $20 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
ACY Securities supports MetaTrader 5, TradingView, MetaTrader 4, while FBS supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. ACY Securities has exclusive access to TradingView.
